ON AIR NOW

LISTEN NOW

Weather

Sponsored By: Two Men and a Truck
cloudy-day
82°
Sct Thunderstorms
H 95° L 79°
  • cloudy-day
    82°
    Current Conditions
    Sct Thunderstorms. H 95° L 79°
  • partly-cloudy-tstorms-day
    91°
    Afternoon
    Sct Thunderstorms. H 95° L 79°
  • cloudy-day
    87°
    Evening
    Partly Cloudy. H 91° L 79°
LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

The latest top stories

00:00 | 00:00

LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

The latest traffic report

00:00 | 00:00

LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

The latest forecast

00:00 | 00:00

Health
Teen drinking and driving down, CDC says
Close

Teen drinking and driving down, CDC says

Teen drinking and driving down, CDC says

Teen drinking and driving down, CDC says

Nine out of 10 U.S. teens are not drinking and driving, according to a new CDC report released today.

"Teen drinking and driving has dropped by more than half in the past 15 to 20 years," said Thomas R. Frieden, MD, MPH, director of the CDC, who spoke at a telebriefing.

While that news is good, "it's really important we keep up the momentum," he said. 

Some teens have not yet gotten the message, he added.

In 2011, 1 in 10 students ages 16 and older reported driving after drinking during the past 30 days, according to the CDC report. And most of those had engaged in binge drinking, defined as having five or more alcoholic drinks in a couple of hours.

That translates to about 950,000 high school students and about 2.4 million episodes of drinking and driving in the 30 days before they answered the survey, Frieden said.

"Teen drinking and driving remains a serious problem," he said. "Road crashes are the leading cause of death in teens in this country and alcohol is a contributing factor in many crashes and deaths."

The report is published in the CDC's Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report.

Teen Drinking & Driving: Behind the Numbers

For the CDC's new Vital Signs report, researchers analyzed data from the 1991 to 2011 national Youth Risk Behavior surveys (in which teens answered questions). They also looked at fatal crash data.

Drivers ages 16 to 20 are 17 times more likely to die in a crash if they have a blood alcohol level of .08% than if they had not been drinking, the researchers found.

Frieden said the decline in teen drinking and driving is due mainly to three key changes:

  • Minimum legal drinking age laws make it illegal to sell alcohol to anyone under 21 in all states.
  • Zero tolerance laws, in effect in every state, make it illegal for those under 21 to drive after drinking any alcohol at all.
  • Graduated driver licensing systems, in place in every state, help young drivers get more experience gradually under less risky conditions. While every state has these systems, the specific rules vary.

Society's view of drinking and driving has changed for the better, too, Frieden said. "A generation ago, it wasn't unusual to hear, 'One for the road,'" he said of drinking.

"Now there is really a social understanding of how dangerous drinking and driving is," he said. "There is now a sense that friends don't let friends drink and drive.''

Teen Drinking and Driving: State by State

Of the 41 states with available data for teen drinking and driving in 2011, the rates varied from 4.6% of teens in Utah to 14.5% in North Dakota.

Besides North Dakota, these states also reported higher rates of teens drinking and driving. All had rates of 11.3% or higher:

  • Alabama
  • Iowa
  • Louisiana
  • Mississippi
  • Montana
  • New Mexico
  • South Carolina
  • South Dakota
  • Texas
  • Wisconsin
  • Wyoming

Data were not available for California, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, Minnesota, Missouri, Pennsylvania, or Maine.

Besides Utah, the states reporting lower rates of teen drinking and driving, with 4.6% to 8.9% of teens reporting the behavior, included:

  • Alaska
  • Colorado
  • Georgia
  • Indiana
  • Kentucky
  • Massachusetts
  • Michigan
  • New York
  • North Carolina
  • Rhode Island
  • Virginia
  • West Virginia

Work Left to Do

To further reduce teen drinking and driving, parents can take a number of steps, Frieden said. "Parents are a key part of the equation here."

They can lead as examples of safe drivers, and do so well before their child is of driving age.

Parents can also provide teens with a safe way to get home if they have been drinking and driving, he said.

Parents can also consider drawing up a parent-and-teen driving agreement, in which the teen agrees to such terms as obeying the speed limit and contacting the parents if he or she needs a ride home. The CDC has a model agreement that parents can use.

SOURCES: CDC telebriefing, Oct. 2, 2012.CDC Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, Oct. 2, 2012.

© 2012 WebMD, LLC. All rights reserved.

Read More
VIEW COMMENTS

There are no comments yet. Be the first to post your thoughts. or Register.

The Latest News Headlines

  • The Long Beach chapter of the United Daughters of the Confederacy has removed a monument to the Confederacy at Hollywood Forever Cemetery. KABC reported that many were unaware that the Confederate memorial was in the cemetery. It was installed in 1925. >> Read more trending news “The Daughters said we are a benevolent organization. We didn’t seek this attention. We don't want to be part of this uproar,” president and co-owner of the cemetery, Tyler Cassity, told KABC. The monument was removed around 4 a.m. Tuesday, KNBC reported. Cassity told told the Los Angeles Times someone wrote, “No” in black marker under the monument’s plaque. Related: There are hundreds of Confederate monuments, not just in the South Significant attention was drawn to the monument after the LA Times wrote an op-ed about California’s Civil War history. The violence at a white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, which led to the death of Heather Heyer, an anti-racist counterportester, increased demand for the monument’s removal. “Some people said, ‘If you don't take it down, we will,’” Cassity told KNBC. After the vandalism, Cassity contacted the Daughters of the Confederacy about removing the monument. “All we wanted was peace, quiet, as we had for many years,” a Daughters of the Confederacy spokeswoman said. “Cemeteries should be respected.” Theodore Hovey, a spokesman for the cemetery, told the Los Angeles Times the monument will be moved to an undisclosed location.
  • Although many monuments to the Confederacy in the United States bear his name, image or both, Robert E. Lee was not in favor of Confederate monuments. >> Read more trending news According to documents from the University of Virginia, Lee declined andinvitation to join officers at the site of the battle of Gettysburg to mark memorials, saying he “could not add anything material to the information existing on the subject.” “I think it wiser, moreover, not to keep open the sores of war but to follow the examples of those nations who endeavored to obliterate the marks of civil strife, to commit to oblivion the feelings engendered,” he said. Related: There are hundreds of Confederate monuments, not just in the South But it does not mean Lee opposed slavery. Lee simply thought it was best not to create monuments to remind the country of a time in which there was nationwide conflict.  Robert E. Lee V, Lee’s great-great grandson, told CNN Wednesday removing the Confederate statues and placing them in a museum may be an option. “Eventually, someone is going to have to make a decision, and if that's the local lawmaker, so be it. But we have to be able to have that conversation without all of the hatred and the violence. And if they choose to take those statues down, fine,” the 54-year-old, who lives in Washington, D.C., said. “Maybe it’s appropriate to have them in museums or to put them in some sort of historical context in that regard.” Related: At least 109 schools named after Confederate figures, study says In an 1856 letter to his wife, Mary Anna Lee, he said of slavery, “I think it however a greater evil to the white man than to the black race, & while my feelings are strongly enlisted in behalf of the latter, my sympathies are more strong for the former. The blacks are immeasurably better off here than in Africa, morally, socially & physically. The painful discipline they are undergoing, is necessary for their instruction as a race, & I hope will prepare & lead them to better things.” Lee died of heart disease in 1870 in Lexington, Virginia, five years after the end of the Civil War.
  • President Donald Trump on Wednesday announced that he is disbanding a pair of White House councils after a receiving a rash of resignations in response to his failure to immediately and forcefully denounce white supremacists in the wake of violent protests in Charlottesville, Virginia. >> Read more trending news “Rather than putting pressure on the businesspeople of the manufacturing council (and) strategy (and) policy forum, I am ending both,” Trump wrote Wednesday in a tweet. “Thank you all!”
  • Hope Hicks, the White House director of strategic communications, will serve as the interim White House communications director, White House officials confirmed to Wednesday. The news of the interim post was first reported by The New York Times on Wednesday morning, citing a “senior administration official.” >> Read more trending news In a statement released to the Wall Street Journal, an unnamed official said an announcement about a permanent White House communications director would come “at an appropriate time.” The Times report came after the Daily Caller, citing a 'White House insider,' reported early Wednesday that Hicks had accepted the White House communications director job most recently held by Anthony Scaramucci, who was ousted after 10 days. Also on Wednesday morning, CNN reported that Hicks would “likely take on the role of White House communications director,” citing three unnamed sources. “Discussions are in the final stages,” CNN reported. >> PREVIOUS STORY: Anthony Scaramucci out as White House communications director Hicks, 28, was press secretary for President Donald Trump's campaign and previously worked for the Trump Organization. Read more here.
  • Now-former Democratic Congresswoman Corrine Brown has been denied a new trial, after being convicted on 18 of 22 federal fraud-related charges in May. A judge has also issued an order denying a motion for acquittal. Brown’s sentencing has now been set for November 16th. Brown was found guilty of soliciting hundreds of thousands of dollars for a sham charity called “One Door For Education”, using the money for personal expenses and lavish events instead. Her Chief of Staff Ronnie Simmons and the President of One Door Carla Wiley both pleaded guilty and testified against Brown at trial. Simmons has now been formally adjudicated guilty and his sentencing has been set for November 15th. Wiley was adjudicated shortly after entering her plea in March 2016, but her sentencing has now also been set for November 15th, to take place in the same courtroom at the same time as Simmons. FULL COVERAGE: Federal fraud trial of former Congresswoman Corrine Brown Brown had sought a new trial by claiming the judge improperly dismissed a juror after deliberations had already started, because that juror said at the outset of deliberations that the “Holy Spirit” had told him Brown was innocent. In the initial order dismissing the juror, District Judge Timothy Corrigan had carefully worded his ruling, saying that it would not have violated the jury process to pray for guidance, but to have an influence that prevents the juror from considering only the evidence- like a determination of innocence from a “Holy Spirit”- crosses the line. “Had Juror No. 13 simply stated to his fellow jurors that he was praying for guidance during the deliberations, that would not have been problematic,” Corrigan’s order says. “But that’s not what happened here.” Jurors are instructed only to consider the evidence of the case presented at trial and the court’s instruction on the law in determining a verdict. Some of that instruction included that jurors must discuss the case with one another and only make their verdict determination after considering all of the evidence with the other jurors. During the jury selection process, they also all agreed they had no religious or moral beliefs that would preclude them from serving in a fair and impartial panel.  Corrigan says he believes the juror felt he was obeying the court’s instructions on deliberations, but that he violated it by holding this conviction before deliberations even started. Corrigan further says he would have come to the same determination if the “Holy Spirit” had told Corrigan that Brown was guilty as well. An alternate juror was seated and the panel was instructed to start deliberations from scratch. The verdicts of guilty on 18 counts and not guilty on 4 counts were unanimously reached after about eleven hours of deliberations. “Corrine Brown is entitled to a fair trial with an impartial jury that reaches a verdict in accordance with the law. That is what she received,” Corrigan’s ruling says. Brown’s motion for acquittal said that prosecutors had not shown she had criminal intent, claiming instead that she had poorly managed her finances and office, but never intended to defraud anyone. Corrigan’s ruling detailed some of the evidence laid out by prosecutors and said the jury could reasonably infer guilt from that. Brown’s attorney further contended that the fact that Brown was found not guilty on four of the charges diminished the government’s proof. Corrigan belives that shows the jury carefully deliberated the evidence and merits of each specific charge. “Suffice it to say, there was more than sufficient evidence to justify the jury’s verdict on each count of conviction,” Corrigan’s ruling says. Brown’s attorney James Smith tells us she’s “understandably saddened and disappointed” by the judge’s rulings, but she remains strong and maintains her innocence. She further wants supporters to know that she appreciates their prayers and will continue fighting. While Smith said Brown is planning to pursue “any and all available legal options”, he declined to get in to many specifics on what those avenues include. He says their focus right now is geting her the best sentence possible, and a motion for reconsideration is something they could look at in the future. The US Attorney’s Office declined to comment about the rulings at this time.

The Latest News Videos