ON AIR NOW

LISTEN NOW

Weather

Sponsored By: Two Men and a Truck
cloudy-day
78°
Partly Cloudy
H 95° L 79°
  • cloudy-day
    78°
    Current Conditions
    Partly Cloudy. H 95° L 79°
  • cloudy-day
    91°
    Afternoon
    Partly Cloudy. H 95° L 79°
  • cloudy-day
    90°
    Evening
    Mostly Cloudy. H 95° L 79°
LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

The latest top stories

00:00 | 00:00

LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

The latest traffic report

00:00 | 00:00

LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

The latest forecast

00:00 | 00:00

Local
$150,000. Too much or little for inventory solution?
Close

$150,000. Too much or little for inventory solution?

$150,000. Too much or little for inventory solution?
Photo Credit: Stephanie Brown
City Council meeting 7/24

$150,000. Too much or little for inventory solution?

They’re two opposing views that show the battle ahead despite a final vote next week.

It’s been a seven month journey since I first asked just how many of your tax dollars were tied in city-owned vacant land, only to find out the city didn’t know for itself.  Since that time I’ve chronicled the city’s attempt to fix that problem while digging deeper on the problems behind the greater issue.

The city has proposed to spend $150,000 to hire a private company to come in and comprehensively inventory and assess all the property it owns, and help determine what to do with it.  They would issue a request for proposal (RFP) for companies to bid on the project and, ideally, meet that budget.  After gaining approval through committees this week, that measure is finally up for a final full council vote Tuesday.

“Unless I get all my questions answered, I probably won’t support it Tuesday,” says Councilman John Crescimbeni.

Crescimbeni’s main concern is the scope of the project.  Through committee meetings, there has been consistent questioning on where the $150,000 figure came from, and the Department of Public Works says the city consulted a number of companies.  Those discussions appear to have been predicated on a rough estimate that the city owns about 2800 parcels of land.

Since this process began, however, I uncovered that as many as 1500 of those parcels are actually owned or partially owned by JEA, meaning the city could not act on them.

Because we’re now dealing with fewer than half the original parcels, Crescimbeni thinks the price needs to drop as well.

“It’s their property. We shouldn’t be messing around with it without their permission,” he says.

As recently as Tuesday morning, the city added language to the RFP, which I obtained, that recognizes the JEA ownership and says once land is identified as JEA-owned, nothing further would be done with it.  It does not, however, make any adjustment in the larger price cap.

The cap itself is a question for other councilmen- but some want to see a higher limit.

“That sounds like an awful lot, in a short time frame, to do the kind of detailed work that we’re requiring,” says Councilman Matt Schellenberg.

The RFP draft I obtained is 46 pages and lists, in detail, nearly 40 specific tasks that must be completed for the thousands of properties. Those tasks are divided in to four general categories- inventory, assess, allocate use, and implement action.  While this current draft of the RFP does not include many specifics on the timeline, committees were told this week the RFP would go out shortly after gaining approval then allow 30 days for responses, two weeks to deliberate those companies, and then 90-120 days to complete the work.

“If they do a shortcut, then we’re in trouble because that means we haven’t really accomplished what we wanted to do,” Schellenberg says.

He tells me he will support the bill, despite these questions, because he wants to ultimately see the solution realized.

I will be at the council meeting Tuesday to follow this final vote, and will continue to investigate this process until this vacant property gets put back to productive use instead of continuing to tie up your tax dollars.

Read More
VIEW COMMENTS

There are no comments yet. Be the first to post your thoughts. or Register.

The Latest News Headlines

  • A 39-year-old Utah woman was killed by her husband aboard a Princess Cruise ship Tuesday night because, he told authorities, she wouldn’t stop laughing at him, according to the FBI. >> Read more trending news An FBI spokeswoman said Thursday that authorities arrested a man in the case after the ship was diverted to Juneau, Alaska. He was identified by The Associated Press as Kenneth Manzanares. Authorities said the woman, who was identified only as K.M., was killed during a loud domestic dispute on the Emerald Princess around 9 p.m. Tuesday, while the ship was traveling the waters off Alaska, The Associated Press reported. “Court documents say a man entered the cabin and saw the woman on the floor covered in blood,” according to the news wire. “Records say Manzanares grabbed his wife’s body and dragged her to the balcony before the witness stopped him.” A passenger on the ship told KTVA that he heard “two or three ladies or girls, definitely women, screaming” on the night of the incident.  He told the news station that his wife looked over their room balcony and saw a man “bruised, cut and covered in blood.” The ship left on Sunday from Seattle, carrying 3,400 passengers on a week-long trip.  The Cox Media Group National Content Desk contributed to this report.
  • Jacob Ohl lost both his legs below the knee when he was run over by a train in Lilburn, Georgia, in March. Four months after he was released from the intensive care unit, Ohl is suing CSX and the operators that were allegedly running the train that hit him. >> Read more trending news Ohl, 17, filed suit in DeKalb County last week. The lawsuit claimed CSX and operators Derrick Tyrone Marshall, of Stone Mountain, and Clifton Edward Martin, of Greenwood, South Carolina, were negligent and that CSX was liable for his injuries, which have already racked up more than $200,000 in medical bills. Ohl was walking along the train tracks with earbuds in on March 2 when he “sensed,” but didn’t hear, a train approaching behind him, his mother wrote on a GoFundMe page after the accident. Ohl’s lawsuit claimed the CSX train did not have a properly functioning front-facing camera, preventing the train’s engineer and conductor from seeing Ohl in time to avoid hitting him. CSX also did not put up fencing or other “warning devices” to keep pedestrians a safe distance from the tracks, the suit said. Ohl was at least 1,000 feet from the train when Marshall and Martin first saw him, but they did not ring the train’s bell, blow the train horn or apply the emergency brake before hitting Ohl, the lawsuit said.  It took half a mile for the train to come to a complete stop after hitting Ohl, Lilburn police said at the time of the accident. The suit asks for compensation for Ohl’s injuries, as well as damages he may suffer in the future. CSX declined to comment on the suit and would not say whether Marshall and Martin are still employed by the company.
  • It’s a new way for those new workers to get to work.  The Jacksonville Transportation Authority is introducing Route 82, with direct shuttle service between Armsdale Park-n-Ride and the Amazon Fulfillment Center Warehouse on Pecan Park Road.  The service is set to launch on Monday, August 7 to coincide with JTA service changes. Route 82 will be operating seven days a week, with service 30 minutes before and after shift changes in the morning and evening. The Amazon shuttle will operate every five to seven minutes during shift changes.  The Armsdale Lot is located at 3191 Armsdale Road, just south of the I-295 W off Lem Turner Road. The Park-n-Ride features parking for 189 cars, bike racks, and ticket vending machines. The Park-n-Ride offers direct connections to the First Coast Flyer “Green Line.” 
  • Starbucks announced Thursday that the company will close all 379 Teavana stores nationwide. In a news release, the company cites poor performance and an inability to reverse the trend. Jacksonville has a location in the St. Johns Town Center and The Avenues. The majority of the stores will close by Spring 2018 and all employees will be given opportunities to apply at other Starbucks stores. Starbucks had acquired the mall-based chain in late 2012, with then-CEO Howard Schultz noting the huge potential for the tea market. Then this past April, the company said it was reviewing its options for the struggling chain. On Thursday, Starbucks CEO Kevin Johnson noted declining foot traffic at malls. 'We felt it was an appropriate time to take the decision and begin shutting down those stores,' he said. The announcement came as Starbucks said global sales rose 4 percent at established locations for the quarter ended July 2, fueled by higher average spending per visit. But the frequency of customer visits was flat from a year ago.

The Latest News Videos