Sponsored By: Two Men and a Truck
cloudy-day Created with Sketch.
H 87° L 75°
  • cloudy-day Created with Sketch.
    Current Conditions
    Thunderstorms. H 87° L 75°
  • partly-cloudy-tstorms-day Created with Sketch.
    Thunderstorms. H 87° L 75°
  • partly-cloudy-tstorms-day Created with Sketch.
    Isolated Thunderstorms. H 83° L 73°

The latest top stories

00:00 | 00:00


The latest traffic report

00:00 | 00:00


The latest forecast

00:00 | 00:00

'E.T.' video games uncovered in New Mexico landfill

Film crews and excavators hit pay dirt at an Alamogordo, N.M., landfill Saturday when they discovered an "extra-terrestrial" piece of video game history. 

"We found an intact 'E.T.' video game. ... 'E.T.' is definitely here. You didn't come out here for nothing and this wasn't a total waste of time." (Via Alamogordo Daily News / Alex Quintana)

Led by screenwriter and director Zak Penn, crews uncovered 30-year-old video game cartridges for the Atari 2600 — one of the first game consoles. Among the discarded treasure was what some consider the worst game ever made — "E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial." (Via WiredTwitter / @stevetilley)

What are tons of antiquated cartridges doing in a New Mexico landfill? And why are people like Penn interested in them?

As it turns out, the discovery is the conclusion of a 30-year-old urban legend that some call Atari's "corporate shame." Let's take a step back in time. (Via CNET)

>> Read more trending stories 

In 1982, the Steven Spielberg-directed film "E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial" was a hit, so the next logical step was to make a video game based on the movie. (Via Universal Pictures / "E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial)

The movie was released in June and according to Mashable, "Atari rushed the game into production so it would be in toy stores for Christmas 1982. Howard Warsaw, the game's developer, says he only had five weeks to build the game — including the design."

What followed was "E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial" game — what is now called an abomination to the gaming industry. (Via Atari, Inc. / "E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial")

Mashable reports Atari spent $125 million on "E.T." The failure of that game and other flops cost Atari $500 million in 1983 and is believed to be one element of the video game crash of 1983. 

It was previously believed that Atari got rid of as many as 3.5 million unsold copies of the game. The New York Times reported in 1983, "The company has dumped 14 truckloads of discarded game cartridges and other computer equipment at the city landfill in Alamogordo, N.M. Guards kept reporters and spectators away from the area yesterday as workers poured concrete over the dumped merchandise."

Over the years, the story of Atari dumping millions of unsold copies of "E.T." became folklore with Warshaw telling A.V. Club in 2005, "I doubt that actually happened." 

Fast-forward nearly a decade and Penn, along with Fuel Entertainment, Xbox Entertainment Studios and Lightbox partnered to make a documentary about Atari's fall and the mysterious burial of all those games. 

And sure enough, they found what they were looking for — cartridges of the game, with some intact. And Warshaw, who once doubted the existence of all those games, was even on hand to see those recovered cartridges. (Via Twitter / @majornelson@zakpenn@kobunheat)

The Alamogordo Daily News said the exact number of "E.T." cartridges is unknown, but previous reports put the estimate at 14-19 truckloads. The documentary on the excavation is expected to be released sometime this year. 

Read More

There are no comments yet. Be the first to post your thoughts. or Register.

The Latest News Headlines

  • Updated at 10:42: The Supreme Court will allow part of the travel ban to take effect; some immigrants will be banned from entering the country.  Update at 10:29 a.m. ET: The  Supreme Court has ruled that it will hear arguments over President Donald Trump’s second executive order banning travel to the United States. Original story: The Supreme Court will rule on Monday whether to hear the challenge to President Donald Trump’s executive order banning immigration from several predominately Muslim nations. That executive order and the revised order that followed were both challenged in lower courts, which ruled in favor of the states that brought suit, setting up today’s decision by the U.S. Supreme Court. Here’s what can happen Monday and some background on the executive order. What is the ban? The original ban was issued on January 27, 2017, and it did the following: - Suspended the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program for 120 days - Cut the number of refugees to 50,000 in 2017 - Banned Syrian refugees from entry into the United States indefinitely - Barred immigrants from seven predominantly Muslim countries -- Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen -- from entering the United States for 90 days. How was it revised? The revised order, executive order 13780, removed Iraq from the list of nations included in the ban, allowed refugees already approved by the State Department to enter the U.S. and lifted the ban on Syrian refugees. It was to go into effect at midnight on March 16, 2017. What will happen on Monday? The court will do one of three things Monday. It will either uphold Trump’s ban, refuse to hear the case or say it will hear the case in the fall when the court reconvenes. What happens if the Supreme Court rules in Trump’s favor? If the court rules in favor of the administration, the ban can be implemented within 72 hours. What happens if the justices refuse to hear the case? If the justices refuse to review the case, the lower court rulings will stand, stopping the Trump administration from banning entry into the U.S. based on the country from which a person emigrates. Will the Supreme Court hear arguments? Justices could choose to hear arguments about the ban in the fall. In the meantime, the lower court orders would stand. What is the background? President Trump signed an executive order that would ban refugees and immigrants from seven mostly Muslim countries from entering the United States for 90 days and would suspend a refugee program for 120 days. It would also ban Syrian refugees from entering the country. That order sparked protests around the country and around the world. The states of Washington, Oregon, Minnesota, New York, Massachusetts and Hawaii filed suits over the ban. In three days, from January 28 to January 31, 50 cases were filed against the order. The courts granted a nationwide temporary restraining order that suspended much of the order. The 9th District Court of Appeals upheld the restraining orders. A revised order was issued in March. That order, like the first, ran into legal challenges. A judge in Hawaii suspended the revised order, ruling that if the ban went into effect, it would likely cause 'irreparable injury' by violating protections granted by the First Amendment against religious discrimination. The judge said tweets by Trump suggested that the order sought to ban people on the basis of their religion, and not in the interest of national security, as Trump had claimed.       
  • A 2-year-old child who was critically injured after being backed over by a vehicle around Midnight has died.   According to JSO a family member momentarily lost track of Christopher Jackson while leaving the Mathews Crossing Apartments on Century 21 Drive near Atlantic Blvd.  Jackson was backed over by the vehicle.  Rescue arrived and rushed the child to a local hospital with life-threatening injuries, where he later died.  JSO is now calling the case an accidental death. 
  • A rabbi is among several people in New Jersey who were arrested Monday in raids by federal and state authorities in a multimillion-dollar welfare fraud investigation. >> Read more trending news  Rabbi Zalmen Sorotzkin and seven others are being charged, accused of taking public assistance and defrauding the government of $1.3 million over recent years, law enforcement officials told the Asbury Park Press. Investigators said that the accused had plans that, a source told the Asbury Park Press, “rival the most sophisticated of financial frauds.” Officials said the people involved under-reported their income. In exchange, they were able to qualify for Medicaid, Section 8 housing assistance, food stamps, Social Security disability and Supplemental Security Income, the Asbury Park Press reported. Officials said the accused, who are four married couples, made thousands of dollars more a year than they told program officials. Investigators said they traced illegal money transfers, along with records from private schools for tuition.  Law enforcement officials said they believe that Monday’s arrest will be the first in a series of arrests in a larger fraud ring.
  • In a big legal victory for President Donald Trump, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday overturned a pair lower court orders from federal appeals courts that had blocked his plans to bar visitors and refugees from six mostly Muslim countries, allowing most of the travel plan to go into effect immediately. The Court also agreed to set arguments in the fall on the matter, as the Justices wrapped up work for their 2016-2017 term. The announcement means that for travelers or refugees – if they have a relative in the United States, or some other direct tie to the U.S. – then those people cannot be blocked by the Trump Administration from traveling here at this time. BREAKING: Supreme Court will review Trump travel ban, allows it to take effect in most instances. — AP Politics (@AP_Politics) June 26, 2017 But for those travelers and/or refugees without a direct reason to come to the United States, the Supreme Court said the President clearly has the right to deny them entry at this time. “But when it comes to refugees who lack any such connection to the United States, for the reasons we have set out, the balance tips in favor of the Government’s compelling need to provide for the Nation’s security,” the Court declared in a Per Curiam opinion. Those who would qualify for travel to the United States would include: + Students who have been admitted to a university + A foreign national who wants to visit a family member + Someone who has accepted a job in the U.S. + An academic who has been invited to give a lecture. The Supreme Court decision though made clear that immigration groups may not simply add the names of people to their client lists, and try to get them admitted to the United States as a result.
  • The Supreme Court on Monday announced that it would listen to arguments surrounding President Donald Trump's controversial travel ban during its October sitting. >> Read more trending news

The Latest News Videos