ON AIR NOW

LISTEN NOW

Weather

heavy-rain-night
58°
Rain
H 67° L 63°
  • heavy-rain-night
    58°
    Current Conditions
    Rain. H 67° L 63°
  • rain-day
    64°
    Evening
    Rain. H 67° L 63°
  • clear-night
    64°
    Morning
    Mostly Clear. H 79° L 68°
LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

The latest top stories

00:00 | 00:00

LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

The latest traffic report

00:00 | 00:00

LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

The latest forecast

00:00 | 00:00

Where YOUR Congressmen and Senators stand on Syria strike

With a debate and vote on a military strike in Syria to now take place in Congress next week, we’re finding out where the people who represent your voice on Capitol Hill stand.

Congresswoman Corrine Brown

Brown says she was leaning toward yes on military action against Syria and that she's glad to hear that the Russian proposal to have Syria turn its chemical weapons over to the international community for destruction.

"It did not have to get to this stage, 100,000 people didn't have to die," says Brown in an interview with WOKV.

Brown says the U.S. should still make sure that this proposal is the diplomatic solution that it appears to be an not just a stall tactic from the Russians. She hopes this proposal could lead to something more, like a ceasefire. She added she was surprised that President Obama took the debate to Congress because she says it doesn't seem like Congress can get anything done right now and this is an issue that needs action quickly.

Congressman Ander Crenshaw

“There’s no way to know what the reaction to a strike might be,” Crenshaw says.  “There are too many risks.”

He says he’s listened to his constituents from Northeast Florida, and they “overwhelmingly” oppose action in Syria.  He said about 90 percent are against it. Still, Crenshaw believes there is “strong evidence” that Syrian President Bashar Assad’s regime was involved with the chemical weapons attack on August 21.

“My point has always been: if this was a violation of the world’s red line, then where is the rest of the world?”

He believes if the U.S. takes military action in Syria, the country could end up in a situation “much worse” than if no action is taken at all.

“There’s no question that it would be very easy to see this escalate into some sort of literal war,” he says.

Rep. Crenshaw says if there are ways to deal with the situation diplomatically, then “we certainly should move in that direction.” But at this point, as far as authorizing military force, he says his answer is “no.”

Congressman Ted Yoho

Congressman Ted Yoho’s message on Syria is clear: the U.S. needs to explore diplomacy before considering a military strike.

“We’re attacking a sovereign nation that has not attacked us,” Yoho tells WOKV.

He says the Arab League needs to weigh in the conflict more than they have and put pressure on Syria

“This is something that’s in their backyard, and they need to have a stronger voice in this.”

Yoho says he doesn’t want to have to commit young American men and women to the conflict if it should come to that in the future, and most of his constituents in Northeast Florida agree.

According to Yoho, the international community has long agreed that countries shouldn’t use chemical weapons.  But they also agreed that countries are in violation of the agreement if they produce, transport or store them.

“North Korea has chemical weapons,” he says.  “Saddam Hussein had them.  He used them against the Kurds in the eighties.  Nothing was done at this point.  So my question is: Why now?  Why the U.S.?”

Congressman Ron DeSantis

Northeast Florida Congressman Ron DeSantis says he plans to vote against the resolution authorizing military force in Syria.

DeSantis said the showdown over Syria is the most one-sided issue he has seen in his time in Washington.

Here is the entire statement from Representative DeSantis:

“I do not support authorizing President Obama to use military force in the Syrian civil war at this time. The Obama administration has not articulated a clear objective for using military force in Syria, much less a plan to achieve that objective. This is all the more problematic given the realities of a Syrian civil war in which Assad’s dictatorship (supported by Iran and Hezbollah) is fighting so-called rebels that are populated with Sunni Islamic supremacists and Al Qaeda fighters. In other words, the United States does not have an interest in assisting either side of the conflict or in refereeing a civil war amongst these warring anti-American factions. Moreover, there is a danger that an ill-planned or half-hearted American attack could make it easier for terrorist groups to obtain the very type of chemical weapons that Al Qaeda and other groups have long sought to use against America.”

Senator Bill Nelson

Nelson says while he supports a strike, it’s hard to tell what will come from it.

“Every day that we face adversaries, there’s always the possibility of going in to a full-fledged war, but that doesn’t mean that we don’t protect our national security interests,” Nelson says.

He says he has met with the regime several times, and knows their capabilities. Further, he’s seen the evidence the US says it has proving the Assad regime used chemical weapons against its people- evidence which Nelson calls conclusive.

And knowing that, he says the US has to intervene.

“We are the only country in the world that has the military capacity to go in and enforce this,” he says.

Even with the risks of intervening, he says the risks of not acting would be even more harmful.

“What do you think that that would send as a message to other rogue nations?”

The only challenge in his view is getting members of Congress to look past their initial “knee-jerk reactions” against the war in favor of actually seeing the evidence in play. 

He thinks the President made a smart move allowing time to educate politicians and the public.

Senator Marco Rubio

Rubio is stopping just short of taking a stance.  A statement issued by Rubio’s office says the US should only look at military action when it is pursuing a “clear and attainable national security goal” and not “simply to send a message or save face”.  He does not directly comment on which of these standards he is currently judging the administration’s position to strike Syria.  He does, however, take it one step further in calling on Congress to return to Washington now to get the debate started. Congressional leadership, however, has signaled that will not be the case, and rather the debate will begin when lawmakers return to Washington next week.

Read More

The Latest News Headlines

  • Two juveniles have been arrested, after the St. Augustine Police Department says they tried to rob another juvenile at gunpoint at a local park. According to the incident report, the juvenile victim told police he was at Project Swing Park at 1 South Castillo Drive this past Sunday night, when he was approached by four individuals. He told police some of these individuals began to dig through his pockets and saying things like 'what you got?' and 'give it up!'.  The victim told police when he refused to give up his belongings, one of his friends attempted to defend him, leading a fight to break out.  During that fight, someone yelled there was a gun and everyone took off running, according to the victim. The report reveals there was at least one witness who spotted one of the individuals pulling a firearm from his waistband and pointing it at someone else.  Police say they caught up to the four individuals in the area of Sevilla Street and Saragossa Street a short time later, where they were taken into custody.  The report reveals that as the investigation continued, two of the four individuals were found to have nothing to do with the robbery that occurred.  However, one of the other individuals was identified as the suspect responsible for digging through the victim's pockets. The report reveals he told police he was ‘just playing.’ As for the other individual, the report says he eventually admitted to police he was armed at that time and helped officers recover the gun. The two juveniles are now charged with attempted robbery with a firearm.  A third juvenile involved in this incident is also expected to face charges, as police say the individual had an open warrant for an unrelated case.
  • Unless there is a major earthquake, you may not pay much attention to the United States Geological Survey. >> Read more trending news  But when the earth shakes, it’s the USGS that provides important initial information on where the damage occurred and how big the quake was.  However, while that is a very important function of the agency, it's only part of the mission of the USGS, or the Survey, as it is commonly called. The agency, a part of the U.S. Department of the Interior, also provides “reliable scientific information to describe and understand the Earth; minimize loss of life and property from natural disasters; manage water, biological, energy, and mineral resources; and enhance and protect our quality of life,” according to the agency’s website. To study and catalog the country’s resources, the USGS employs a broad array of sciences, including biology, geography, geology and hydrology.  Created on March 3, 1879, the USGS’s original mission was 'classification of the public lands, and examination of the geological structure, mineral resources, and products of the national domain.” The Survey was immediately tasked with the exploration and inventory of new lands the U.S. government had acquired through the Louisiana Purchase in 1803 and the Mexican–American War in 1848.  The agency also produces various publications in which its research is reported and runs the United States Geological Survey Library. The USGS employs more than 8,600 people across the United States. Related stories: 15 things you may not know about earthquakes What is the strongest earthquake to hit the US? What should you do if you are caught in an earthquake? What are the 10 deadliest earthquakes in recorded history? How likely will the ‘big one’ occur in our lifetime?  New earthquake simulations show how the 'big one' could shake the Pacific Northwest Building an emergency disaster kit can be easy and cheap, here's how
  • Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has returned to her bench eight weeks after undergoing lung cancer surgery. >> Read more trending news  NPR reported that the 85-year-old underwent a pulmonary lobectomy Dec. 21 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York. The surgery removed two malignant growths on her left lung, according to court officials. No further evidence of cancer was found on her lungs. Related: Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg released from hospital after cancer surgery The Associated Press reported Ginsberg returned to the Supreme Court building Friday for the justices’ private conference. She came back to the bench for the first time Tuesday, wearing her black robe and ornamental collar. CNBC reported that Ginsberg participated in the court’s cases while she was away, unprecedented for a justice. NPR reported she was also walking more than a mile a day and working with her trainer twice a week, according to friends.
  • A day after posting a photograph online of a federal judge which included a crosshairs near her head, U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson ordered Roger Stone to appear at a Thursday hearing to explain what he was doing, and whether it should impact restrictions imposed on Stone about charges brought against him in the investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 elections, and any ties to the Trump campaign. In an order issued Tuesday morning, U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson summoned Stone to explain “why the media contact order entered in this case and/or his conditions of release should not be modified or revoked in light of the posts on his Instagram account.” Stone posted the photo on Monday – and stood by it for much of the day – repeating his objections to having his case assigned to Judge Jackson, who is also presiding over a case brought by the Special Counsel’s office against 12 Russian intelligence agents, charged with hacking materials from Democrats during the 2016 campaign. “Any inference that this in someway threatens the judge is false,” Stone wrote on Monday about the photo – which he then pulled down. Roger Stone now directly attacking the federal judge presiding over his case and posting a pic of her head beside crosshairs pic.twitter.com/ze3lnuoSOE — Jon Swaine (@jonswaine) February 18, 2019 Monday night, Stone’s lawyers submitted an official “Notice of Apology” to the judge, trying to head off any sanctions. “Undersigned counsel, with the attached authority of Roger J. Stone, hereby apologizes to the Court for the improper photograph and comment posted on Instragram today. Mr. Stone recognizes the impropriety and had it removed,” his lawyers wrote. But that evidently was not enough for Judge Jackson, whose order raised the question of whether further limits would be placed on Stone, a political operative who worked briefly for the Trump campaign, and has been charged with coordinating actions between the campaign and Wikileaks over emails involving the Hillary Clinton campaign. Stone has charged that the Special Counsel’s office wrongly tipped off CNN to his imminent arrest in late January; last week, the judge ordered the feds to submit information about that matter.
  • A judge in Washington has set a hearing for political consultant Roger Stone to allow him to explain why he shouldn’t have the conditions of his bond modified -- or even revoked -- after he posted a photo on social media that showed the judge next to what appeared to be a rifle’s crosshair. >> Read more trending news In a notice filed Monday in court, Stone apologized to U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson 'for the improper photograph and comment posted on Instagram.' >> Mueller investigation: Judge issues gag order in Roger Stone case He had earlier in the day posted the image to Instagram along with his repeated objections to having his case assigned to Jackson, Vox.com reported. The judge is also tasked with overseeing special counsel Robert Mueller’s case against 12 Russian intelligence agents who have been accused of hacking  the Democrats during the 2016 presidential campaign, according to Cox Media Group’s Jamie Dupree. >> From Cox Media Group's Jamie Dupree: Roger Stone ordered to explain posted photo of federal judge In a court filing Tuesday, Jackson ordered Stone to appear in court at 2:30 p.m. Thursday. Jackson last week put restrictions on prosecutors and on Stone’s attorneys to keep either party from making statements near the courthouse to either members of the media or the public. She also ordered Stone to refrain from making public comments on the case within the vicinity of the courthouse. >> Who is Roger Stone, what links him to Trump? In Jackson’s ruling, Stone was allowed to continue expressing his opinions via social  media, which he is known for, though Jackson reserved the right to adjust the order in the future. Stone, who served as a campaign manager for Trump during his 2016 presidential campaign, faces charges brough by Mueller’s team of obstruction, giving false statements and witness tampering. >> More on Robert Mueller's investigation Since his arrest Jan. 25 at his home in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, Stone has been outspoken in proclaiming his innocence and criticizing Mueller’s team, which he has accused of targeting him because of his politics. Stone is the sixth Trump aide to be charged in connection with Mueller’s investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election and its possible ties to Trump campaign officials.

The Latest News Videos