ON AIR NOW

LISTEN NOW

Weather

cloudy-day
88°
Mostly Cloudy
H 85° L 78°
  • cloudy-day
    88°
    Current Conditions
    Mostly Cloudy. H 85° L 78°
  • cloudy-day
    83°
    Evening
    Mostly Cloudy. H 85° L 78°
  • cloudy-day
    79°
    Morning
    Partly Cloudy. H 89° L 77°
LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

The latest top stories

00:00 | 00:00

LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

The latest traffic report

00:00 | 00:00

LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

The latest forecast

00:00 | 00:00

National
Treasury Sec. Steve Mnuchin denies Congressional request for Trump’s tax returns
Close

Treasury Sec. Steve Mnuchin denies Congressional request for Trump’s tax returns

Treasury Sec. Steve Mnuchin denies Congressional request for Trump’s tax returns
Photo Credit: Alex Brandon/AP
President Donald Trump walks on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, Monday, April 22, 2019, during the annual White House Easter Egg Roll. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

Treasury Sec. Steve Mnuchin denies Congressional request for Trump’s tax returns

Treasury Sec. Steve Mnuchin has denied a Congressional request for President DonaldTrump’s tax returns.

>> Read more trending news 

The returns were originally requested last month by House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Rep. Richard Neal, D-Mass., one of four people authorized to request usually private income tax returns under a little-known IRS code.

Update 6:03 p.m. EDT May 6:  Responding by the May 6 deadline, Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin has rejected a House Committee’s request for President Donald Trump’s tax returns, according to The Associated Press.

In a letter Monday, Mnuchin told Ways and Means Committee Chairman Richard Neal that the panel's request for Trump’s returns “lacks a legitimate legislative purpose.”

Mnuchin said, after consulting with the Justice Department, he decided that the department is “not authorized to disclose the requested returns and return information,” the AP reported.

The rejection is expected to spark a legal battle over Trump’s returns.

Trump is the only president in modern history who has refused to make his tax returns public.

Original story: The deadline passed Tuesday afternoon for the Internal Revenue Service to hand over six years of President Donald Trump’s tax returns to a congressional committee.

The returns were originally requested earlier this month by House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Rep. Richard Neal, D-Mass., one of four people authorized to request usually private income tax returns under a little-known IRS code. Neal had set a final deadline for the documents for 5 p.m. Tuesday.

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin now says a final decision will be given to Congress by May 6.

>> From Cox Media Group’s Jamie Dupree: IRS to give final decision on Trump tax returns by May 6

Officials earlier this month asked for more time to review Neal’s request, with Treasury Department Secretary Steve Mnuchin emphasizing in a letter to the chairman that the tax code he cited to get Trump’s returns was not meant to be used “for political reasons,” including “for purposes of embarrassing or attacking political figures of another party.”

Section 6103(f) of the Internal Revenue Code says the Treasury Department secretary “shall furnish … any return or return information” requested by a handful of lawmakers, including Neal. The information could then be shared with the House Ways and Means Committee “only when sitting in closed executive session” unless Trump allows for further disclosure, according to the Internal Revenue Code.

>> Trump’s tax returns: What is 6103 and how will it be used to get Trump’s returns? 

In a letter sent April 13 to IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig, Neal rejected the Treasury Department’s opposition to the release, pointing to the clear wording of section 6103(f) of the Internal Revenue Code.

“It is not the proper function of the IRS, Treasury or Justice to question or second guess the motivations of the Committee or its reasonable determinations regarding its need for the requested tax returns and return information,” Neal wrote.

>> From Cox Media Group’s Jamie Dupree: Feds ignore deadline from Democrats on Trump tax returns

He added that “concerns about what the Committee may do wit the tax returns and return information are baseless.”

“This request falls squarely within the Committee’s oversight authority,” Neal said. “The IRS, Treasury, and Justice must assume that the Committee Members, like all government officials, will act properly in the conduct of their official duties.”

>> From Cox Media Group’s Jamie Dupree: IRS, Treasury sidestep answer on call for Trump tax returns 

If authorities fail to turn over the documents, Democrats warned a legal battle is likely to follow.

“If the IRS does not comply with the request, it is likely that Chairman Neal will subpoena the returns,” House Ways and Means Committee member Rep. Judy Chu, D-Calif., told Reuters. “If they do not comply with that (subpoena), a legal battle will begin to defend the right of oversight in Congress.”

Mnuchin previously told Congress that authorities “will comply with the law” in regard to releasing Trump’s tax returns. 

>> Trump downplays House Democrat's request for tax returns, says he's under audit

In his original request for Trump’s tax returns, Neal also asked officials to specify whether any of them had been “under any type of examination or audit” and “the issue(s) under examination.”

Trump has repeatedly declined to release his tax returns, citing an ongoing audit.

“I would love to give them, but I’m not going to do it while I’m under audit,” Trump told reporters April 10.

 

Read More

The Latest News Headlines

  • Officials are investigating after an explicit video was shared “inadvertently and unknowingly” from a Mississippi teacher’s phone, authorities said. >> Read more trending news  According to a statement from Horn Lake police, the department received information regarding the video Wednesday.  DeSoto County Schools are conducting an investigation into the video, which reportedly showed explicit content of a teacher in the district. Police said if there was a “criminal element regarding the release of the video,” Horn Lake officers will then initiate a full investigation. School officials have not identified the teacher who was seen in the video, and the contents of the video have not been released at this time. The school district did confirm to WHBQ that the teacher involved is no longer an employee there. Again, officials told WHBQ that the video was shared without the teacher’s knowledge.
  • The Jacksonville Sheriff's Office is asking for the public's help identifying a suspect they say committed a burglary involving a battery in Arlington. According to police, their investigation has revealed that a suspect entered a victim's home overnight while she was asleep. Police say the suspect woke up the victim, threatened and battered her, and then took some of her belongings.  If you have information on who this individual is, you're urged to contact the sheriff's office at (904) 630-0500 or Crime Stoppers at 1-866-845-TIPS.
  • In a series of tweets Friday, President Donald Trump announced new retaliatory tariffs against China, bumping up taxes by 5 percentage points.  >> MORE: China, Trump ratchet up tensions with new tariffs >> Read more trending news  Here’s a look at trade tariffs and what they do. What is a tariff? A tariff is a tax on imports or exports that increases their prices. Tariffs are used by governments to make foreign products less attractive to consumers in order to protect domestic industries from competition. Money collected under a tariff is called a duty or customs duty. What types of tariffs are there?There are two types of tariffs – an ad valorem tariff and a specific tariff. An ad valorem tariff is a tariff that is a fixed percentage of the value of an imported good. If the price of the imported good goes up, the ad valorem tariff goes up. If it goes down, the tariff goes down. For instance, if a company exports an item to the United States costing $50 and the ad valorem tariff on that product is 20 percent, the company would have to pay the tariff -- $10 in this case -- to export the product to the U.S. If the price of the item goes up to $75, the company will have to pay a tariff of $15 to sell the item in the US. A specific tariff is a fixed amount of money placed on the item no matter the cost. Say there is a $20 specific tariff on that $50 item. The company exporting the item to the US would have to pay $20 to sell the item in the U.S. If the item goes up in cost to $75, the company will still have to pay $20 to export the item. Why should I care if the US government puts a tariff on items? The manufacturer pays for that, right? Sure, manufacturers pay the tariff upfront, but the cost of the tariff will be passed along to the consumer. Or, if the cost of the tariff is too high for those exporting goods, then they stop exporting goods. Tariffs affect the cost of goods you buy, and the U.S. buys many more products than it sells. So, why slap tariffs on goods if it will hurt the US consumer? The theory is that as goods made by people outside the U.S. get more expensive, manufacturers within the country will either increase their production of the product or other companies will begin to produce the product, thus strengthening the U.S. economy.
  • The Baker County Sheriff's Office is announcing an arrest, following an incident Thursday were a young child was found unresponsive in a hot car. According to the sheriff's office, the 3-year-old boy's mother is now being charged with child neglect. Deputies say 23-year-old Katie Davis failed to provide the toddler with proper care and supervision.  Investigators say the boy's father had been at work all night and went to bed at approximately 7:00 AM, Thursday morning. They say that Davis also went back to sleep around that same time with the child, despite having slept some the night before.  Investigators say when Davis woke up around 1:30 PM, she realized the boy was no longer in the bed. We're told that she then discovered him inside the couple's car outside, where some of his toys had been kept.  Deputies say Davis and her husband were able to get him out by smashing one of the windows and unlocking the doors.  The boy was airlifted to Wolfson Children's Hospital in Jacksonville, Thursday afternoon. Deputies said Friday he's recovering and stable.
  • According to many polls, Americans – especially those who say they are Democrats -- are not that fond of the Electoral College. Neither are many of the Democratic candidates for president. >> Read more trending news  With just over 14 months until the 2020 presidential election, a movement to change the way electoral votes are awarded and who will be elected president has gained some steam. The National Popular Vote Compact (NPV), which has its roots in the most contested presidential election in U.S. history, sets in state law a policy that awards all a state’s electoral votes to the candidate who wins the national popular vote. Under the Electoral College system used today, 48 states have a “winner-take-all” system that awards all the state’s electoral votes to the person who gets a majority of votes in that state. The Electoral College does not take into consideration that national popular vote. Sixteen states, along with the District of Columbia, have passed the NPV agreement. They are California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maryland, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon and Rhode Island. While legislation has been passed in the 16 states and the District of Columbia, the agreement would not go into effect until states with a collective 270 electoral votes — the number needed to win the presidency — agree to join. Currently, the District of Columbia and the 16 states in the agreement hold a combined total of 196 electoral votes, meaning the pact would need enough new state members to get 74 electoral votes.Supporters say the system would give the person who got the most votes country-wide the presidency he or she deserves. Opponents say states would be forced to hand over electoral votes to a candidate who did not win that state. For instance, in the 2016 election, a state such as Florida, in which President Donald Trump earned more votes, would have had to pledge its 29 electoral votes to Trump’s opponent, Hillary Clinton, who won the national popular vote in the 2016 election. The Electoral College of today was established by the Twelfth Amendment to the Constitution which replaced the method for electing the president and vice president provided in Article II, Section 1, Clause 3. Under the system, when voters cast a ballot for president, they are actually choosing members of the Electoral College, called electors, who are pledged to that presidential candidate. Following the election for president, electors then meet to choose the president. Electors almost always vote for their state’s popular vote winner, and some states have laws requiring them to do so. However, electors are not bound by federal law to vote for a specific candidate – for instance, the one who won the popular vote in their state. In 29 states and the District of Columbia, electors are bound by state law or by a pledge they sign to vote for the candidate who won the popular vote of the state they represent. Five men have won the presidency in the Electoral College while not winning the country’s popular vote: John Quincy Adams in 1824, Rutherford B. Hayes in 1876, Benjamin Harrison in 1888, George W. Bush in 2000 and Donald Trump in 2016. The National Popular Vote campaign goes back to Democratic presidential candidate Al Gore's loss to Bush in 2000, according to The Associated Press. Gore won the popular vote but lost the election over a vote count in Florida.

The Latest News Videos