Mostly Cloudy
H 85° L 78°
  • cloudy-day
    Current Conditions
    Mostly Cloudy. H 85° L 78°
  • cloudy-day
    Mostly Cloudy. H 85° L 78°
  • cloudy-day
    Partly Cloudy. H 89° L 77°

The latest top stories

00:00 | 00:00


The latest traffic report

00:00 | 00:00


The latest forecast

00:00 | 00:00

Mueller report: Key findings from the investigation

Mueller report: Key findings from the investigation

Mueller Report: Key Findings from the Investigation

Mueller report: Key findings from the investigation

Attorney General William Barr on Thursday released a redacted version of the long-awaited report into allegations that Donald Trump’s presidential campaign colluded with Russia to win the 2016 election.

>> Read the Mueller report

The release of the report came nearly two years after Mueller was appointed by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, in his role as acting attorney general for matters related to the 2016 campaign due to the recusal of Attorney General Jeff Sessions, to investigate any connection between Donald Trump’s presidential campaign and Russian interference in the 2016 campaign.

Here are the key findings of the report:

  1. The report found no evidence that anyone on Trump’s campaign knowingly cooperated with the Russians to influence the campaign.
  3. When then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions told Trump that Mueller had been appointed special counsel, a note taker for Sessions wrote that Trump slumped back in his chair and said, “Oh, my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I’m f--ked.”
  5. Mueller examined 10 actions taken by Trump as president to determine whether he sought to obstruct justice. Muller says he could not reach a conclusion “based on the facts and the applicable legal standards.” The report said: “While the investigation identified numerous links between individuals with ties to the Russian government and individuals associated with the Trump Campaign, the evidence was not sufficient to support criminal charges. Among other things, the evidence was not sufficient to charge any Campaign official as an unregistered agent of the Russian government or other Russian principal. And our evidence about the June 9, 2016 meeting and WikiLeaks’ release of hacked materials was not sufficient to charge a criminal campaign-finance violation,” the report said.
  7. Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election in “sweeping and systematic fashion.”
  9. WikiLeaks asked Donald Trump Jr. to tweet a link in order to help them with “digging through leaked emails” from the Democratic National Committee. Trump Jr. tweeted the link two days later. “Some evidence” showed Trump knew about former national security adviser Michael Flynn’s calls with the Russian ambassador. The evidence was “inconclusive,” the report said.
  11. Mueller worried that if he subpoenaed Trump to answer questions in person it would create a substantial delay in the investigation. Mueller considered Trump’s written answers “inadequate,” but decided against a subpoena fight.
  13. The special counsel consulted with the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel on the prospect of indicting a sitting president when making a determination about whether Trump obstructed justice. 
  15. Trump wanted former White House counsel Don McGahn to tell Rod Rosenstein to have Mueller removed from the investigation. McGahn did not carry out that request. McGahn decided “that he would resign rather than trigger what he regarded as a potential Saturday Night Massacre.”
  17. Mueller referred 14 separate investigations to other prosecutors. Those investigations that came out of his investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election. 
  19. Mueller said there was ample evidence of contacts between the Trump campaign and Russia as it engaged in hacking campaigns. The evidence, Mueller said, was not strong enough to support bringing criminal charges.
  21. For Mueller to find evidence of collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign, the Trump campaign would have had to agree to act, the report points out. There was no evidence Trump’s campaign conspired to work with the Russians.
  23. Trump probably fired FBI Director James Comey for refusing to clear Trump’s name.
  25. Trump told aides not to publicly disclose any information about Donald Trump Jr.’s meeting with a Russian lawyer.
  27. Trump called then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions at home and again asked him to reverse his recusal from the Russia investigation.
  29. Former national security advisor Michael Flynn’s lawyer refused to share information about what he had told the special counsel’s team. The president’s lawyer said he would tell the president of Flynn’s "hostility."
  31. Trump wanted K.T. McFarland, the deputy national security adviser, to draft a letter stating that he did not direct Flynn to talk with the Russian ambassador to the U.S. McFarland did not draft the letter because she wasn’t sure if the president was telling her the truth.



Mueller Report: Read the report Barr just released

Read More

The Latest News Headlines

  • Officials are investigating after an explicit video was shared “inadvertently and unknowingly” from a Mississippi teacher’s phone, authorities said. >> Read more trending news  According to a statement from Horn Lake police, the department received information regarding the video Wednesday.  DeSoto County Schools are conducting an investigation into the video, which reportedly showed explicit content of a teacher in the district. Police said if there was a “criminal element regarding the release of the video,” Horn Lake officers will then initiate a full investigation. School officials have not identified the teacher who was seen in the video, and the contents of the video have not been released at this time. The school district did confirm to WHBQ that the teacher involved is no longer an employee there. Again, officials told WHBQ that the video was shared without the teacher’s knowledge.
  • The Jacksonville Sheriff's Office is asking for the public's help identifying a suspect they say committed a burglary involving a battery in Arlington. According to police, their investigation has revealed that a suspect entered a victim's home overnight while she was asleep. Police say the suspect woke up the victim, threatened and battered her, and then took some of her belongings.  If you have information on who this individual is, you're urged to contact the sheriff's office at (904) 630-0500 or Crime Stoppers at 1-866-845-TIPS.
  • In a series of tweets Friday, President Donald Trump announced new retaliatory tariffs against China, bumping up taxes by 5 percentage points.  >> MORE: China, Trump ratchet up tensions with new tariffs >> Read more trending news  Here’s a look at trade tariffs and what they do. What is a tariff? A tariff is a tax on imports or exports that increases their prices. Tariffs are used by governments to make foreign products less attractive to consumers in order to protect domestic industries from competition. Money collected under a tariff is called a duty or customs duty. What types of tariffs are there?There are two types of tariffs – an ad valorem tariff and a specific tariff. An ad valorem tariff is a tariff that is a fixed percentage of the value of an imported good. If the price of the imported good goes up, the ad valorem tariff goes up. If it goes down, the tariff goes down. For instance, if a company exports an item to the United States costing $50 and the ad valorem tariff on that product is 20 percent, the company would have to pay the tariff -- $10 in this case -- to export the product to the U.S. If the price of the item goes up to $75, the company will have to pay a tariff of $15 to sell the item in the US. A specific tariff is a fixed amount of money placed on the item no matter the cost. Say there is a $20 specific tariff on that $50 item. The company exporting the item to the US would have to pay $20 to sell the item in the U.S. If the item goes up in cost to $75, the company will still have to pay $20 to export the item. Why should I care if the US government puts a tariff on items? The manufacturer pays for that, right? Sure, manufacturers pay the tariff upfront, but the cost of the tariff will be passed along to the consumer. Or, if the cost of the tariff is too high for those exporting goods, then they stop exporting goods. Tariffs affect the cost of goods you buy, and the U.S. buys many more products than it sells. So, why slap tariffs on goods if it will hurt the US consumer? The theory is that as goods made by people outside the U.S. get more expensive, manufacturers within the country will either increase their production of the product or other companies will begin to produce the product, thus strengthening the U.S. economy.
  • The Baker County Sheriff's Office is announcing an arrest, following an incident Thursday were a young child was found unresponsive in a hot car. According to the sheriff's office, the 3-year-old boy's mother is now being charged with child neglect. Deputies say 23-year-old Katie Davis failed to provide the toddler with proper care and supervision.  Investigators say the boy's father had been at work all night and went to bed at approximately 7:00 AM, Thursday morning. They say that Davis also went back to sleep around that same time with the child, despite having slept some the night before.  Investigators say when Davis woke up around 1:30 PM, she realized the boy was no longer in the bed. We're told that she then discovered him inside the couple's car outside, where some of his toys had been kept.  Deputies say Davis and her husband were able to get him out by smashing one of the windows and unlocking the doors.  The boy was airlifted to Wolfson Children's Hospital in Jacksonville, Thursday afternoon. Deputies said Friday he's recovering and stable.
  • According to many polls, Americans – especially those who say they are Democrats -- are not that fond of the Electoral College. Neither are many of the Democratic candidates for president. >> Read more trending news  With just over 14 months until the 2020 presidential election, a movement to change the way electoral votes are awarded and who will be elected president has gained some steam. The National Popular Vote Compact (NPV), which has its roots in the most contested presidential election in U.S. history, sets in state law a policy that awards all a state’s electoral votes to the candidate who wins the national popular vote. Under the Electoral College system used today, 48 states have a “winner-take-all” system that awards all the state’s electoral votes to the person who gets a majority of votes in that state. The Electoral College does not take into consideration that national popular vote. Sixteen states, along with the District of Columbia, have passed the NPV agreement. They are California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maryland, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon and Rhode Island. While legislation has been passed in the 16 states and the District of Columbia, the agreement would not go into effect until states with a collective 270 electoral votes — the number needed to win the presidency — agree to join. Currently, the District of Columbia and the 16 states in the agreement hold a combined total of 196 electoral votes, meaning the pact would need enough new state members to get 74 electoral votes.Supporters say the system would give the person who got the most votes country-wide the presidency he or she deserves. Opponents say states would be forced to hand over electoral votes to a candidate who did not win that state. For instance, in the 2016 election, a state such as Florida, in which President Donald Trump earned more votes, would have had to pledge its 29 electoral votes to Trump’s opponent, Hillary Clinton, who won the national popular vote in the 2016 election. The Electoral College of today was established by the Twelfth Amendment to the Constitution which replaced the method for electing the president and vice president provided in Article II, Section 1, Clause 3. Under the system, when voters cast a ballot for president, they are actually choosing members of the Electoral College, called electors, who are pledged to that presidential candidate. Following the election for president, electors then meet to choose the president. Electors almost always vote for their state’s popular vote winner, and some states have laws requiring them to do so. However, electors are not bound by federal law to vote for a specific candidate – for instance, the one who won the popular vote in their state. In 29 states and the District of Columbia, electors are bound by state law or by a pledge they sign to vote for the candidate who won the popular vote of the state they represent. Five men have won the presidency in the Electoral College while not winning the country’s popular vote: John Quincy Adams in 1824, Rutherford B. Hayes in 1876, Benjamin Harrison in 1888, George W. Bush in 2000 and Donald Trump in 2016. The National Popular Vote campaign goes back to Democratic presidential candidate Al Gore's loss to Bush in 2000, according to The Associated Press. Gore won the popular vote but lost the election over a vote count in Florida.

The Latest News Videos