Mostly Cloudy
H 94° L 77°
  • cloudy-day
    Current Conditions
    Mostly Cloudy. H 94° L 77°
  • cloudy-day
    Mostly Cloudy. H 94° L 77°
  • partly-cloudy-tstorms-day
    Sct Thunderstorms. H 91° L 77°

The latest top stories

00:00 | 00:00


The latest traffic report

00:00 | 00:00


The latest forecast

00:00 | 00:00

Roe v. Wade faces challenges in several states. Here they are

Roe v. Wade faces challenges in several states. Here they are

Roe v. Wade faces challenges in several states. Here they are
Photo Credit: (Mickey Welsh/The Montgomery Advertiser via AP)
Bianca Cameron-Schwiesow, from left, Kari Crowe and Margeaux Hartline, dressed as handmaids, take part in a protest against HB314, the abortion ban bill, at the Alabama State House in Montgomery, Ala., on Wednesday April 17, 2019.

Roe v. Wade faces challenges in several states. Here they are

Alabama legislators on Tuesday passed the most restrictive anti-abortion bill in the country, promising to jail for 99 years any doctor who performs the procedure.

>> Read more trending news

If signed into law by Alabama’s governor, the legislation, passed by the Alabama Senate on a 25-6 vote, will ban abortions within the state’s borders with some exceptions for the life of the mother.

>> Ohio law gets challenge: Federal lawsuit filed to challenge Ohio’s heartbeat abortion ban law signed by DeWine

There are no exceptions in the bill for someone who is pregnant because of rape or incest.

Alabama’s bill follows on the heels of other state legislation designed to curtail abortion. Just last week, Georgia’s Gov. Brian Kemp signed a so-called “fetal heartbeat” bill into law, making abortions after the first six weeks of pregnancy illegal.

Legislators in Alabama have said the bill was specifically passed in order to trigger a court challenge that would land the argument about terminating a pregnancy once again before the U.S. Supreme Court. The goal, opponents of abortion say, is to overturn Roe v. Wade, the 1973 landmark decision making abortion legal in the United States.

Before Tuesday’s action by the Alabama legislature, four states had passed legislation restricting abortion since Jan. 1.

Here is a look at some of the legislation that has passed and what it could mean for the future of Roe v. Wade.

What does Roe v. Wade say?

In Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court ruled that a Texas state law that banned abortions was unconstitutional. The court ruled that under the ruled that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, women had a fundamental "right to privacy" that allows pregnant women to choose whether or not to have an abortion.

The ruling went on to say that, in the court’s opinion, having an abortion in the first trimester of pregnancy was no more dangerous than carrying a fetus to full term.
Justices William Rehnquist and Byron White voted against the ruling, the. The other seven judges, including Chief Justice Warren Burger, voted in favor of the ruling.

If Roe v. Wade set a precedent for future cases, how can the ruling be challenged?

First, let’s look at precedent. As a legal term, precedent means that decisions in certain cases establish a principle or rule for future courts to follow.

In the case of Roe v. Wade, opponents of abortion hope to alter or abolish Roe by having a state abortion law challenged in lower courts and ultimately end up being heard by the U.S. Supreme Court.

How would the hearing of an abortion rights case change Roe v. Wade? 

Those who oppose abortion feel the current makeup of the Supreme Court is the most favorable in decades for a chance to make changes to or overturn Roe. Of the nine justices, five are considered conservative and four liberal.

What’s the big deal about getting the Supreme Court to hear a case? Doesn’t the Supreme Court automatically hear cases appealed from lower courts?

No, the U.S. Supreme Court decides which cases it will hear. The court will hear only three types of cases – original jurisdiction cases, meaning a case brought by one state against another state or against the federal government; cases “affecting ambassadors or other public ministers and counsel; or, as in the abortion debate, cases that request a review of decisions of lower courts such as federal appellate or district courts.

Of those three types of cases, the court decides as a body which cases it will hear during a session.

What type of abortion legislation has the best chance to end up in the U.S. Supreme Court?

Alabama’s abortion legislation is the latest in a series of recent state laws aimed at restricting abortions or the services abortion clinics offer.

The legislation, which has become known as “heartbeat bills,” make abortion illegally if a fetus’ heartbeat can be detected, generally at about six weeks.

Sponsors of the state bills, and many of the governors who have signed them, admit the goal of the legislation is to set up a Supreme Court showdown on abortion rights. 
Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine said he knew his state’s heartbeat bill would be challenged, and that was its goal.

“Taking this action really is a kind of a time-honored tradition, the constitutional tradition of making a good faith argument for modification or reversal of existing legal precedents,” he said. “So that is what this is.”

In Alabama, Rep. Terri Collins, R, the sponsor of the Alabama legislation, said Tuesday, “This bill is about challenging Roe v. Wade and protecting the lives of the unborn because an unborn baby is a person who deserves love and protection. I have prayed my way through this bill. This is the way we get where we want to get eventually.”

In February, the U.S. Supreme Court blocked Louisiana’s abortion law that would have resulted in one doctor in a single clinic in the state authorized to perform abortions.

On a 5-4 vote with Chief Justice John Roberts joining with the court’s four liberal justices, a temporary stay was ordered, but a final decision was not reached in the case. Supreme Court watchers believe it’s likely the justices will hear a challenge to the law in the next term.

Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh said they would have denied the stay, according to The New York Times.

Which states have heartbeat bills? What about other abortion restriction bills? 

Fetal heartbeat laws make abortion illegal after the time the heartbeat of a fetus can be detected.

Prior to Tuesday’s vote in Alabama, six states – Ohio, Georgia, Iowa, North Dakota, Kentucky and Mississippi – have passed fetal heartbeat laws. Eleven other states are considering such legislation, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a research and policy organization committed to advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights.

Legislation in four states has already run into legal challenges – North DakotaArkansasIowa, and Kentucky – and are currently blocked from going into effect. Mississippi’s ban is being challenged, and the Center for Reproductive Rights has asked a judge to stop the law from going into effect on July 1. 

Prior to Alabama’s action on Tuesday, four states had passed such laws since Jan. 1.
Legislation that includes other restrictions to abortions could make their way to the Supreme Court. An Indiana law would have banned abortions for fetal anomalies is one such law. In Missouri, a law requiring clinics that provide abortions to be set up as ambulatory surgical centers and doctors who provide abortions to have admitting privileges at local hospitals was struck down by a federal appeals court.

A Texas law that bans a method of abortion called dilation and evacuation, or D&E, was being challenged in court this past fall.

What happens if Roe v. Wade is overturned?

Every state abortion ban set to go into effect has been blocked or delayed by lower courts, and abortion remains legal in the United States.

However, some see the day that Roe could be challenged or overturned.
If Roe is overturned, abortion in the United States would not necessarily be illegal. The decision on whether an abortion is legal would revert to the states.

In some states, bans on abortion have remained on the books. Other states have begun to introduce and pass “trigger laws,” or laws that would trigger a ban on abortion should Roe be overturned. Louisiana, Mississippi, North Dakota, and South Dakota have such laws.

Read More

The Latest News Headlines

  • An American alligator that's become known as 'Chance the Snapper' has arrived at his new home in St. Augustine.  After being rescued from a lagoon in Humboldt Park in Chicago, 'Chance the Snapper' will live out the rest of his days at the St. Augustine Alligator Farm.  As part of his introduction to his new home, 'Chance the Snapper' was weighed and measured. The park says he's exactly 4-feet long and weighs 18 pounds.  While he appears to be pretty health, we're told 'Chance the Snapper' will be quarantined in his own pool for 90 days as they learn more about his history and whether he carries any diseases. If everything checks out, the plan is to eventually introduce him to other alligators.  St. Augustine Alligator Farm staff believe based on his health and light coloring, he was likely released by someone who may have been keeping him as a pet or he somehow escaped on his own.  It's not believed that 'Chance the Snapper' would have been able to survive a Chicago winter. WATCH: ‘Chance the Snapper’ arrives at his new home at the St. Augustine Alligator Farm
  • If you are one of the average Americans who eat 23 pounds of ice cream a year, then Sunday will be a good day for you. It’s National Ice Cream Day, and restaurants across the country are offering deals on cones, cups and shakes. >> Read more trending news  If any food deserves its own day, ice cream would be it. The creamy treat is an $11 billion industry that generates $1.6 billion in wages, according to the International Dairy Foods Association's economic report. According to ice cream makers and retailers, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio and Wisconsin are the country’s most successful ice cream markets.  Below are some deals you can snag on ice cream treats this weekend. Note: Not every restaurant in a chain may be honoring the deals, so be sure to check with local ice cream shops to confirm which deals are available before you go. Baskin-Robbins: On Sunday, guests can purchase two prepacked quarts of any ice cream for just $7.99. On Wednesday, July 31, fans can “Celebrate 31” with $1.70 scoops. The deal is valid on 4-ounce single scoops only. Waffle cones and toppings are extra. The deal cannot be combined with other offers and is valid at participating U.S. stores. Carvel: Buy one cup or cone of soft ice cream and get a free cup or cone free all day Sunday. Cold Stone Creamery: Cold Stone Creamery has a buy one, get one free offer when you sign up by Thursday for the Cold Stone rewards program on the company's website.  Dairy Queen: Dairy Queen has a buy one Cupfection treat for 99 cents, get one free offer through Sunday at participating locations. Limit one per customer. Dippin' Dots: Participating Dippin’ Dots locations will be giving away a free mini cup of Dippin’ Dots during a two-hour window on Sunday. Customers should check their local store for the hours. GODIVA Boutiques: Godiva Boutiques will offer 50% off soft serve and parfaits at participating locations.  Johnny Rockets: Get a free milkshake when you purchase an entree on National Ice Cream Day. McDonald’s: At participating locations, McDonald’s is offering a summer deal in which you can get a vanilla cone for $1. Monkey Joe's: On Sunday, kids can get a free ice cream cup with a paid admission while supplies last. This offer cannot be combined with any other offers.  PetSmart: PetsHotel at participating PetSmart locations is offering a free doggie ice cream topped with dog biscuit treats on Saturday and Sunday from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. each day. Potbelly Sandwich Shop: Get a large hand-dipped milkshake free on Sunday when you purchase an entree. Mention National Ice Cream Day at the register to claim the deal. Your Pie: Get a free scoop of Italian gelato with any purchase Sunday. Yogurtland: Buy one ice cream, get one free when you visit Yogurtland on Sunday from 1 p.m. to 6 p.m.
  • Kentucky police officials have charged a Louisville attorney with assault after he allegedly attacked a colleague with a Lysol can during a fight in the courthouse. Lindsey Scott, 63, is charged with second-degree assault in the incident, according to WDRB in Louisville. He was booked into and released from the metro jail. >> Read more trending news  Jefferson County Sheriff’s Office officials said another defense attorney, James “J.R.” Moore, was working on some of his cases around 8 a.m. Wednesday in an attorney workroom next to a district courtroom. At some point, Scott entered the room. “Some sort of altercation developed,” Lt. Col. Carl Yates, a spokesman for the Sheriff’s Office, told the news station. Scott is accused of hitting Moore with the aerosol can, causing cuts to his head. When deputies got to the room, Moore was restraining Scott and both were covered with blood, Yates said. The workroom had to be shut down and cleaned of the blood. Surveillance footage released to local news stations by the Sheriff's Office shows the bloody scene, as well as a handcuffed Scott sitting on a bench with blood covering his white suit. Moore was sent to the hospital, where he told WAVE 3 News in Louisville he received about a dozen staples to his head. Scott, who told deputies he was suffering chest pains, was taken to the hospital as well, but was later booked into the jail. Moore later posted a message on Facebook about the skirmish. “Today, I was totally blindsided while peacefully eating my breakfast,” Moore wrote, according to WAVE 3 News. “First thing I felt was a thud. Just a scalp wound. “My friends need not be concerned. All concerns should be for my perpetrator. Something is apparently very wrong in his life. He is a good man.” Other attorneys also expressed shock over the incident, saying both Moore and Scott are well-known and well-liked. Wednesday’s incident is not the first time Scott has been behind bars. According to the Courier-Journal, the attorney was at the center of a sensational court case in the 1980s when, as a corporal in the U.S. Marine Corps, he was convicted of raping and attempting to kill a fellow Marine’s wife at the Quantico military base in Virginia. Scott, a Louisville native, was sentenced to 30 years in prison, but the verdict was later overturned on the grounds he received ineffective counsel from his civilian lawyer, the Courier-Journal reported. The Washington Post in 1988 covered his second military trial, at the end of which he was exonerated by the military jury of charges of attempted murder, rape, sodomy and abduction. Scott, who had spent four years in Fort Leavenworth, wept silently, the Post reported. “In the tiny spectators’ gallery, Scott’s ailing mother, Mildred, began to shout in a gravelly voice, ‘Thank you, Jesus! Thank you, Lord Jesus! Thank the Lord for giving me back my innocent child!’ before she was pulled from the courtroom by four or five supporters,” the Post story read. The Post reported there was one significant difference in evidence between the first and second trials: the recollection of a former security officer at a Zayre department store in Woodbridge, about 12 miles from Quantico, who testified she saw Scott shopping in the store at the time the victim was being attacked on the base. Her testimony backed up Scott’s claim that he had spent the evening of the attack shopping for his pregnant wife’s birthday, which was the following day, the Post said. The victim also had trouble identifying Scott in the days after the attack, saying each time that other men in the photos and lineup resembled him. The Post reported she said she picked Scott out of the lineup because, “He scares me the most.” No physical evidence linked Scott to the crime, the newspaper said. The case relied on circumstantial evidence, including the determination that the woman's throat was slashed with a serrated knife. Scott had borrowed a serrated knife from his apartment manager that day and never returned it, the Post reported. He told investigators he inadvertently threw it away after using it to clean his stove. Scott also lived in the same apartment complex as the 23-year-old woman and her husband and, because he was a military policeman training as a criminal investigator, would have had knowledge of police procedures regarding evidence gathering. The woman's attacker knew her address, her husband's name and his job, as well as the 'jargon' used by military police, the Post said. According to investigators, the assailant lured the woman from her home by calling and saying her husband had been in an accident, then offering to drive her to the hospital. He instead took her to a wooded area and assaulted her, leaving her for dead, authorities said. The victim picked Scott's car out of a lineup, telling authorities it was the one in which she had been sexually assaulted, the Post reported. Scott's supporters argued that race was a factor in his conviction because he is black and his alleged victim was white. “I maintained my innocence from the beginning,” Scott told reporters after the not guilty verdict. “It was proven today by a jury of my peers that I was innocent. I’m innocent. I’m free.” Gary R. Myers, one of Scott's defense attorneys, told the Post after the verdict: 'I think (jurors) just came to the conclusion that it was a tossup, and a tossup is not a guilty verdict.' Scott’s case was the basis of a 1999 movie, “Dangerous Evidence: The Lori Jackson Story,” which focused on the civil rights activist who fought to have the courts take a second look at Scott’s conviction. WAVE 3 News reported that those who know Scott said his experiences motivated him to go into law. The Courier-Journal reported that, at age 43 in 1999, he began law school at the University of Louisville. According to the Kentucky Bar Association, Scott was admitted in October 2002. He is in good standing and has no record of public discipline.
  • The Jacksonville Sheriff’s office is asking for your help finding a missing 11-year-old. Addison Terry is described as 5’2”, 107 lbs., with blue eyes and brown hair. She was last seen wearing a blue shirt. Terry ran away from the Youth Crisis Center on Parental Home Road on the Southside last night, according to JSO. YCC’s website shows they provide short term crisis care, mental health counseling, skills-based group training, and transitional living services for children and families. JSO says Terry may be in the Orange Park area, or other parts of Clay County or Jacksonville. If you have any information about her location, you’re asked to contact JSO at 904-630-0500 or JSOCrimeTips@jaxsheriff.org.
  • A federal judge in New York declined Thursday to grant bail to wealthy financier Jeffrey Epstein as he awaits trial on allegations of sex trafficking. >> Read more trending news  Update 12 p.m. EDT July 18: Lisa Bloom, the attorney for three of Epstein's accusers, issued a statement after a judge denied Epstein bail. 'We are pleased that the judge denied bail,' Bloom said on Twitter. 'It gives us hope that justice may truly be possible against this sex offender who has hurt so many for so long.' Update 11:35 a.m. EDT July 18: U.S. District Judge Richard Berman has rejected Epstein's bail application, citing danger to others and the community. Prosecutors had asked Berman to hold Epstein, 66, without bail, arguing in court on Monday that Epstein is a flight risk and danger to the community who has shown no remorse for victimizing dozens of girls as young as 14 between 2002 and 2005. Attorneys for Epstein had argued he poses no flight risk, as evidenced by his conduct since pleading guilty in 2008 to two counts of soliciting a minor for prostitution after he was accused of molesting girls in Palm Beach County, Florida. Update 9:50 a.m. EDT July 18: An Austrian passport found by authorities during a search of Epstein's Manhattan mansion included several stamps inside, 'including stamps that reflect use of the passport to enter France, Spain, the United Kingdom, and Saudi Arabia in the 1980s,' prosecutors said in a letter filed Thursday in court. Authorities said the passport, issued in the 1980s and bearing Epstein's image but not his name, was found July 6 in a safe. Attorneys for Epstein claimed in court filings that the Austrian passport had never been used. 'Epstein -- an affluent member of the Jewish faith -- acquired the passport in the 1980s, when hijackings were prevalent, in connection to Middle East travel,' Epstein's attorneys said. 'The passport was for personal protection in the event of travel to dangerous areas, only to be presented to potential (kidnappers), hijackers or terrorists should violent episodes occur.' It was not immediately clear how Epstein obtained the passport. Update 12:40 p.m. EDT July 15: Two of Epstein's alleged victims on Monday asked Berman not to allow the 66-year-old to be released on bail pending his trial. Both spoke at his bail hearing in New York. Courtney Wild said she was 14 years old when Epstein started sexually abusing her in Palm Beach, Florida, according to Courthouse News. She told the court that if Epstein were to be granted bail, he would be 'a scary person to have walking the streets,' CNN reported. Annie Farmer said she met Epstein when she was 16 years old and that he behaved inappropriately, though she declined to give details, according to Courthouse News. She also asked Berman not to grant bail to Epstein. Prosecutors said Monday that during a search of Epstein's home safe, authorities found a bogus passport that listed a Saudi Arabia residence, 'piles of cash' and 'dozens of diamonds.' The passport, issued in the 1980s, had Epstein's photo on it but a different name. Prosecutors said previously that federal agents found a trove of nude photos during the raid on Epstein's mansion following his arrest on sex trafficking charges. Update 10:30 a.m. EDT July 15: Epstein will remain incarcerated until at least Thursday, when a judge said he'll likely rule on whether to grant bail to the 66-year-old, CNN reported. Several of Epstein's alleged victims were in court Monday, according to Courthouse News. Prosecutors said Friday in a court filing that multiple victims have told government officials that they want Epstein detained until his trial because they fear his release will give him the opportunity to harass them. Original report: Epstein's attorneys have asked a judge to allow their client to be detained at his Manhattan mansion until trial and offered to put up a 'substantial' bond to ensure his compliance with the proposed terms of his release. Among other things, Epstein's attorneys proposed he be fitted with a GPS device and said their client would agree to ground his private jet. In a response filed Friday, prosecutors argued Epstein should be held without bond due the severity of his charges and his financial means. Prosecutors said they believe Epstein might have tried to influence witnesses after discovering that he had paid a total of $350,000 to two individuals, including a former employee, in the last year. Authorities said that several more women have come forward to accuse Epstein of sexually abusing them since charges against the New York hedge fund manager were made public last week. Officials have said authorities found 'hundreds or thousands of nude and seminude photographs of young females in his Manhattan mansion on the night of his arrest,' evidence which they say eliminates 'any doubt that the defendant is unrepentant and unreformed.' Epstein is accused of sexually exploiting and abusing dozens of girls at his homes in New York and Florida, heading a sex trafficking scheme that saw his victims recruiting other girls to be abused. He pleaded not guilty last week to sex trafficking and sex trafficking conspiracy charges. Epstein avoided significant jail time and federal prosecution in 2008 as part of a deal overseen by then-U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta. As part of the non-prosecution agreement, Epstein pleaded guilty to a pair of lesser charges and agreed to register as a sex offender. He served 13 months in jail as part of the deal. Acosta said his office 'proceeded appropriately, based on the evidence' in 2008, but scrutiny of the once-secret deal, detailed in a series of in-depth reports published last year by The Miami Herald, prompted him to resign last week from his role as President Donald Trump's secretary of labor. The Associated Press contributed to this report.

The Latest News Videos