ON AIR NOW

LISTEN NOW

Weather

Sponsored By: Two Men and a Truck
cloudy-day Created with Sketch.
89°
Thunderstorms
H 90° L 75°
  • cloudy-day Created with Sketch.
    89°
    Current Conditions
    Thunderstorms. H 90° L 75°
  • partly-cloudy-tstorms-day Created with Sketch.
    78°
    Evening
    Thunderstorms. H 90° L 75°
  • cloudy-day Created with Sketch.
    76°
    Morning
    Cloudy. H 83° L 74°
LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

The latest top stories

00:00 | 00:00

LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

The latest traffic report

00:00 | 00:00

LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

The latest forecast

00:00 | 00:00

Local
Committee wants to move past 'absurd' debate of 2010 with vote to move forward HRC appointments
Close

Committee wants to move past 'absurd' debate of 2010 with vote to move forward HRC appointments

Committee wants to move past 'absurd' debate of 2010 with vote to move forward HRC appointments
Photo Credit: Stephanie Brown

Committee wants to move past 'absurd' debate of 2010 with vote to move forward HRC appointments

It was nearly an hour of debate spent on a topic that wasn’t set for discussion.

Jacksonville’s Rules Committee Tuesday moved forward the appointment and reappointment of three people to Jacksonville’s Human Rights Commission, and the resolutions will now receive a final vote in front of the full Council next week.

Rules Chair Clay Yarborough had deferred action on these resolutions- appointing Mario Ernesto Decunto and reappointing Parvez Ahmed and Susan Harthill- until the next Rules meeting.

City Councilman John Crescimbeni appealed the decision of the chair- a little used move in Council chambers. Councilmen Yarborough, Ray Holt and Robin Lumb opposed the appeal, but Councilmen Warren Jones, Lori Boyer and Jim Love joined Crescimbeni, forcing the action today.

“It would have been nice had we not been blindsided by this, but just allow the process to go forward,” Lumb says.

Decunto’s appointment and Harthill’s reappointment went through with little discussion, and all committee members, except Lumb, voted in favor. Lumb made clear his vote against the appointments and reappointments was a protest of being “blindsided” by the decision to take the vote up today.

“This is basically a vote of ‘no confidence’ for reasons that aren’t very good,” he says.

Crescimbeni says nobody should have been blindsided because he has been a vocal opponent of any action that would co-mingle these appointments and a bill from Councilman Matt Schellenberg which would reduce the size of the Human Rights Commission. Yarborough cited that as the reason for deferring the vote, saying he wanted to give Schellenberg’s bill a chance to work through council first.

“I feel like we have two issues before this body: we have appointments and we have a bill to talk about reducing the size or changing the size of a certain commission, which happens to be what you’re up for an appointment for- and they are two issues,” Crescimbeni says.

The bill came up several times in the course of the discussion.  Councilman Warren Jones says, in his view, Schellemberg’s bill is a clear ploy to get Ahmed off the HRC.

“Stevie Wonder could see through that. Everybody knows the motivation behind the legislation, let’s be honest,” he says.

That drew quick retort from Boyer, who says she believes Schellenberg at his word.

“Thank you, Mr. Jones. I appreciate you NOT knowing my position,” Schellenberg says.

Debating Ahmed

The majority of the debate was focused on the reappointment of Dr. Parvez Ahmed to the HRC.  The discussion that took place when he was appointed in 2010 is still a sore spot for some on the council, and Lumb says he wanted to use this process as an opportunity to clear the air and set the record straights.

“I was planning on asking Dr. Ahmed a number of questions. That opportunity is now foreclosed,” he says.

Lumb specifically has concerns over statements on anti-blasphemy laws as well as involvement, on behalf of CAIR, in a lawsuit.  Other councilmembers shared some concerns as well, but were not as confident we would come out of the public comment clean.

“Sometimes, it’s not always beneficial to draw out, ad naseum, controversial issues,” Boyer says.

Jones doesn’t think Ahmed should need to be so severely rescreened after serving the HRC with no complaints and no questions about him surfacing.

“Jacksonville is bigger than that, they are better than that, and we won’t tolerate it,” he says.

Ultimately, Ahmed’s reappointment passed by the slimmest margin of 4-3.

Learning from the past

Tolerance was a big theme for multiple councilmembers who alluded to the discussion from 2010, as well as debate which happened just a few months ago on expanding Jacksonville’s Human Rights Ordinance.

“To defer these appointments would be an embarrassment- a continued embarrassment- to the city,” Crescimbeni says.

Jones stressed that “embarrassments” like that have other cities competing for business “laughing” at Jacksonville because it will not advance protections, a mirror argument to what he said when pushing the HRO expansion.

Even those who protested today’s action didn’t seem against the vote itself.

On a number of occasions, Lumb said his concerns over Ahmed were not based on Ahmed’s religion or any claims he had not thoroughly researched.  He also says he supports the idea of a Human Rights Commission, although he says the city’s current one needs some retooling.

Read More
VIEW COMMENTS

There are no comments yet. Be the first to post your thoughts. or Register.

The Latest News Headlines

  • Updated at 10:42: The Supreme Court will allow part of the travel ban to take effect; some immigrants will be banned from entering the country.  Update at 10:29 a.m. ET: The  Supreme Court has ruled that it will hear arguments over President Donald Trump’s second executive order banning travel to the United States. Original story: The Supreme Court will rule on Monday whether to hear the challenge to President Donald Trump’s executive order banning immigration from several predominately Muslim nations. That executive order and the revised order that followed were both challenged in lower courts, which ruled in favor of the states that brought suit, setting up today’s decision by the U.S. Supreme Court. Here’s what can happen Monday and some background on the executive order. What is the ban? The original ban was issued on January 27, 2017, and it did the following: - Suspended the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program for 120 days - Cut the number of refugees to 50,000 in 2017 - Banned Syrian refugees from entry into the United States indefinitely - Barred immigrants from seven predominantly Muslim countries -- Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen -- from entering the United States for 90 days. >> Read more trending news How was it revised? The revised order, executive order 13780, removed Iraq from the list of nations included in the ban, allowed refugees already approved by the State Department to enter the U.S. and lifted the ban on Syrian refugees. It was to go into effect at midnight on March 16, 2017. What will happen on Monday? The court will do one of three things Monday. It will either uphold Trump’s ban, refuse to hear the case or say it will hear the case in the fall when the court reconvenes. What happens if the Supreme Court rules in Trump’s favor? If the court rules in favor of the administration, the ban can be implemented within 72 hours. What happens if the justices refuse to hear the case? If the justices refuse to review the case, the lower court rulings will stand, stopping the Trump administration from banning entry into the U.S. based on the country from which a person emigrates. Will the Supreme Court hear arguments? Justices could choose to hear arguments about the ban in the fall. In the meantime, the lower court orders would stand. What is the background? President Trump signed an executive order that would ban refugees and immigrants from seven mostly Muslim countries from entering the United States for 90 days and would suspend a refugee program for 120 days. It would also ban Syrian refugees from entering the country. That order sparked protests around the country and around the world. The states of Washington, Oregon, Minnesota, New York, Massachusetts and Hawaii filed suits over the ban. In three days, from January 28 to January 31, 50 cases were filed against the order. The courts granted a nationwide temporary restraining order that suspended much of the order. The 9th District Court of Appeals upheld the restraining orders. A revised order was issued in March. That order, like the first, ran into legal challenges. A judge in Hawaii suspended the revised order, ruling that if the ban went into effect, it would likely cause 'irreparable injury' by violating protections granted by the First Amendment against religious discrimination. The judge said tweets by Trump suggested that the order sought to ban people on the basis of their religion, and not in the interest of national security, as Trump had claimed.       
  • A 2-year-old child who was critically injured after being backed over by his mom’s vehicle around Midnight, has died.   According to JSO, Christopher Jackson Jr.’s mom was visiting a relative at the Mathews Crossing Apartments on Century 21 Drive near Atlantic Blvd.  The mother asked a relative to watch the boy so that she could go to the store.  He was able to leave the apartment without the relative’s knowledge, and was struck by his mother as she was backing out of a parking spot.   Family members drove the boy to Memorial Hospital where he later died.   Police say the mother did not exhibit any indications of impairment.  JSO is now calling the case an accidental death.  
  • UPDATE: Palm Bay police have reported that Victoria Stites, missing since Sunday, has been found safe. She was located in Jamaica, New York. No further details were immediately released. ORIGINAL STORY: Police are asking for the public’s help in finding a Florida teen who is missing and considered to be in danger. >> Watch the news report here Victoria Stites, of Palm Bay, is 19, but her mental capacity is lower than her age, Palm Bay police say. She is possibly traveling to Jamaica, New York, with a man she met on Facebook. >> Read more trending news She was last seen Saturday leaving her Palm Bay home, north of Vero Beach, wearing a green shirt and black jeans, and carrying a purple duffel bag.  She has blonde/brown hair and brown eyes. She is about 5-foot-7 and weighs 135 to 140 pounds.  Anyone with information on her whereabouts is asked to call 1-800-423-TIPS. 
  • After a reported bank robbery in Mandarin, the Jacksonville Sheriff's Office is now tying the same suspect to at least three other crimes.   Between May 18, 2017, and June 16, 2017, JSO says there are four bank robberies in the Jacksonville-area that appear to be related:  06/16/2017 – BB&T Bank located at 11331 San Jose Boulevard  06/07/2017 – Bank of America located at 13170 Atlantic Boulevard  05/25/2017 – First Florida Credit Union located at 4530 St Johns Avenue  05/18/2017 – Atlantic Coast Federal Bank located at 8048 Normandy Boulevard   In each robbery, police say the suspect enters the bank wearing a hat and sunglasses and then approaches the teller, pulls out a black semi-automatic handgun, and demands money. Once the suspect receives the money, he flees the area on foot.   If you have any information about where this suspect is, or even who he is, you're urged to contact the Sheriff's Office at (904) 630-0500. 

The Latest News Videos