On Air Now

Listen Now

Weather

cloudy-day
60°
Mostly Clear
H 68° L 51°
  • cloudy-day
    60°
    Current Conditions
    Mostly Clear. H 68° L 51°
  • clear-night
    57°
    Evening
    Mostly Clear. H 68° L 51°
  • cloudy-day
    53°
    Morning
    Partly Cloudy. H 76° L 56°
Listen
Pause
Error

The latest top stories

00:00 | 00:00

Listen
Pause
Error

The latest traffic report

00:00 | 00:00

Listen
Pause
Error

The latest forecast

00:00 | 00:00

Local
Jax Council members divided on allowing school infrastructure tax vote
Close

Jax Council members divided on allowing school infrastructure tax vote

Jax Council members divided on allowing school infrastructure tax vote
Photo Credit: ActionNewsJax.com

Jacksonville City Hall.

Jax Council members divided on allowing school infrastructure tax vote

The Duval County School Board is moving forward with their push to have you decide whether to pay a new tax to support nearly $2 billion in school infrastructure needs, but there is a big hurdle they still need to overcome before you would vote.

The Jacksonville City Council has to authorize putting the question on a ballot, and they have discretion in not only deciding when the vote should take place, but if it should take place at all. Because of that, WOKV has reached out to everyone on the 19-member governing body, to see where they stand.

So far, the responses are split.

District 1 Councilwoman Joyce Morgan attended Tuesday night’s School Board meeting where the Board approved the tax, and speaking after that, she said she believes the measure should go to voters. District 9 Councilman Garrett Dennis and District 7 Councilman Reggie Gaffney also support putting the measure on a ballot, although Gaffney does want more details on the plan itself.

“I know that the schools in my district, my community needs new schools. They’re the oldest schools in the city,” Gaffney says.

At-Large Group 1 Councilwoman Anna Lopez Brosche is another sitting Council member that’s backing the proposal to put the matter to voters.

“The school system is a critical component of the community’s success in meeting the needs of citizens, and attracting companies to Jacksonville and the city plays a vital role in making sure we are proud of, celebrate, and market all of our schools and not just a select few,” she says.

She did raise a question about the timing of the referendum. The current proposal calls for a special election November 5th, but the City Council does have the ability to change that.

The special election request by the School Board is something that a lot of Council members in opposition to this plan are zeroing in on.

At-Large Group 2 Councilman John Crescimbeni says he doesn’t support the resolution as it stands, because he doesn’t support putting this matter on a single-issue, special election ballot. He says turnout for special elections is generally low, and this is a matter that is better suited for a regularly scheduled election.

District 4 Councilman Scott Wilson also says he doesn’t support the referendum at this time, in part because of the cost of a single-issue special election. The Duval County Public School District estimates the cost of this election to be between $700,000 and $1.4 million, depending on whether mail-in ballots and early voting are also authorized.

Wilson further says he knows schools are in need of repair, but wants more public input and detail about the plan itself. At-Large Group 5 Councilman Sam Newby also says more time needs to go toward exploring the issue.

Council President Aaron Bowman, who represents District 3, thinks there should also be a focus on school system performance, and he questions whether- with the increased emphasis at the state level on supporting charter schools- the student population projections the District is working with will hold true in the coming years.

“This initiative seems to be moving very fast without explaining what options there are, why the taxpayer should approve it, and why it needs to be done now. It is an expense to hold a Special Election that I see as a very tough sell to the population without a campaign to educate and gain support on asking the public to raise their taxes,” Bowman says.

Those are similar concerns raised by District 6 Councilman Matt Schellenberg, who is also against the measure. He wants more evidence that new schools will help the quality of education overall, and details on how construction would be prioritized over the 15-year life of the tax.

“I think there’s a lot of unanswered questions, and I think they’re way ahead of the game. I think that they haven’t done their jobs educating the City Council or the people to understand what’s going on,” he says.

The School Board spoke at length about acknowledging the need to continue to educate the community on the details of the proposal they’re currently working from. They have not yet approved the final Master Plan capital outlay plan which this tax would support, but the District says that Plan would be finalized before the referendum. 

The nearly $2 billion proposal includes a comprehensive list of which schools would be renovated, rebuilt, or consolidated, as well as the need to get that done. The money would also be used for safety, security, and technology upgrades at schools. DCPS says the District’s schools are the oldest in the state, and keeping up with the maintenance alone has become incredibly costly, with the bill only continuing to grow. The half-cent sales tax has a 15-year life, and the District estimates that would mean about $80 million annually, or $1.2 billion over the 15 years.

WOKV also asked Jacksonville Mayor Lenny Curry whether he will support putting this measure on a ballot. A City Spokesperson says he has no comment at this time.

The timing of the vote could actually mean that this issue doesn’t fall on some sitting Council members to decide, because there are several new City Council members taking office July 1st. In addition to the five new Council members who were elected in March, five of the 19 Council seats are up for election next week, and at least two of those will be filled by someone who’s not currently on the Council. WOKV reached out to all new incoming Council members and candidates in the remaining races, for their thoughts on the referendum, if the matter does fall to the new Council.

Incoming At-Large Group 4 Councilman Matt Carlucci says, after speaking with the Superintendent about what the funding would be used for and the anticipated impact on student performance, he is inclined to support putting it on the ballot this year. Incoming District 13 Councilman Rory Diamond says with this overall cost and need so high, this all feels rushed.

“We owe it to our school children and the tax payers to take a break and ask the School Board to come back with a far more detailed and accountable plan,” he says.

At-Large Group 1 candidate Lisa King says she supports putting a referendum on the ballot so Duval voters can decide. King is running against current District 10 Councilman Terrance Freeman, who has not yet responded to our request for information.

In District 8, candidate Tameka Gaines Holly says this matter should be put to voters, but she wants to first see an approved plan that incorporates feedback from the community and other stakeholders. She is running against incumbent Councilwoman Ju’Coby Pittman, who has not yet responded to our request for information.

District 14 candidate Sunny Gettinger says she supports putting this on a ballot, but thinks the timing, and subsequent turnout, would be better with an existing election, as opposed to a special one. She is running against Randy DeFoor in this race, and DeFoor has not yet responded to our request. Neither of them are sitting members of the City Council.

WOKV will continue to update this story as we get more responses from City Council members, incoming Council members, and remaining Council candidates.

Read More

The Latest News Headlines

  • House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said she will ask Thursday for the drafting of articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump. >> Read more trending news  Update 11:45 a.m. Dec. 5: House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy is speaking with reporters after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced Thursday that the House will move forward with articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump. Update 11 a.m. EST Dec. 5: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is speaking with reporters after announcing earlier Thursday that the House plans to move forward with articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump. Counsels for Republicans and Democrats will present impeachment evidence Monday at a 9 a.m. hearing, according to Politico and Axios. The Judiciary Committee will also hold a hearing to mark up the articles of impeachment, according to Axios. Update 9:50 a.m. EST Dec. 5: Officials with President Donald Trump’s 2020 re-election campaign slammed the decision announced Thursday morning by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to draft articles of impeachment against Trump. “The facts are uncontested,” Pelosi said at a news conference Thursday morning. “The president abused his power for his own personal political benefit at the expense of our national security.” Marc Lotter, director of strategic communications for Trump’s 2020 campaign, said in a tweet that Democrats decided to impeach the president “over ‘feels’ not ‘facts.'” Campaign manager Brad Parscale accused Democrats of trying to “take the decision of who should be president out of the hands of voters.” “Impeaching the President has always been their goal, so they should just get on with it so we can have a fair trial in the Senate and expose The Swap for what it is,” he said. “Speaker Pelosi, Chairman (Adam) Schiff, and Hunter Biden should testify, and then we can get back to the business of our country.” Democrats have been building a case for impeachment against Trump based on his decision to ask Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, one of several Democrats vying for the 2020 presidential nomination. Trump has denied any wrongdoing. Update 9:30 a.m. EST Dec. 5: White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Democrats “should be ashamed” after the California politician announced plans to move forward with articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump.  “(Trump) has done nothing but lead our country - resulting in a booming economy, more jobs & a stronger military, to name just a few of his major accomplishments,” Grisham wrote Thursday morning in a tweet. “We look forward to a fair trial in the Senate.” Pelosi said Thursday morning that Trump’s decision to ask Ukraine for an investigation into his political rival, former Vice President Joe Biden, were “a profound violation of public’s trust.” “The president abused his power for his own personal political benefit at the expense of national security by withholding military aid and crucial Oval Office meeting in exchange for an announcement of an investigation into his political rival,” she said. Update 9:20 a.m. EST Dec. 5: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced Thursday morning that the House will move forward to draft articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump. “The facts are uncontested,” she said at a news conference Thursday morning. “The president abused his power for his own personal political benefit at the expense of our national security.” The announcement came one day after House Democrats held a closed-door meeting on impeachment, according to Cox Media Group’s Jamie Dupree. The House Judiciary Committee also held its first hearing Wednesday on impeachment. “Our democracy is what is at stake,” Pelosi said Thursday. “The president leaves us no choice but to act.” The historic announcement came as Democrats push toward a vote, possibly by Christmas. Original report: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi will give an update Thursday morning on the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump. The California Democrat plans to make the announcement from the Speaker’s Balcony Hallway at 9 a.m. EST. On Wednesday, the impeachment inquiry moved to the House Judiciary Committee as three of four law professors considered experts in impeachment from across the country testified they believe Trump’s action toward Ukraine constitutes bribery. The three professors – Pamela Karlan, Noah Feldman and Michael Gerhardt – were called by the Democrats. The fourth professor testifying Wednesday, Jonathan Turley, called by Republicans, did not agree. House Democrats launched the inquiry in September to investigate whether Trump abused his power by pressuring Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to announce investigations into former Vice President Joe Biden and Biden’s son, Hunter, and their connection to a Ukrainian energy company in exchange for an invitation to the White House and a military aid package. Read more here or here. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
  • An Oklahoma man was arrested this week on two different felony charges after investigators say he knowingly transmitted HIV to at least two victims. >> Read more trending news  Court papers state Benjamin Whitney had consensual sex with the victims and didn’t tell them he had HIV. In one case, the victim reportedly said Whitney explicitly told him he was not infected with the virus. The victim didn’t know he had it until he started feeling ill shortly after their sexual encounter and was tested by the Tulsa County Health Department. In the second case, the victim reportedly didn’t know he had it until he was approached by others who told him he may want to get checked. Court papers state Whitney was diagnosed with HIV in 2014 and received counseling regarding his test results, so he was aware he had it. Whitney was charged in July and was arrested on Tuesday. Read more here.
  • A Kentucky mother is facing a murder charge after her toddler son died from injuries he suffered during recent flooding in Edmonson County. >> Read more trending news  According to WBKO and WNKY, Alexandra Richardson, 28, of Bowling Green, was arrested Wednesday on charges of murder, wanton endangerment and operating a vehicle while under the influence of drugs after her 20-month-old son, Carson McCollough, died at a hospital in Nashville, Tennessee, late Tuesday. She also was charged with possessing drugs and drug paraphernalia, officials said. An arrest warrant obtained by WBKO alleged that Carson and Richardson’s 7-year-old son were in the vehicle Monday when their mother “wantonly drove ... around a ‘road closed’ sign and into a flooded creek” on Oak Hill Road. Although Richardson and the older boy escaped the waters, the toddler was swept away, WBKO reported. Rescue crews found Carson and rushed him to a Bowling Green hospital, authorities said. A helicopter then flew the boy to Monroe Carell Jr. Children’s Hospital at Vanderbilt, where he died, according to WBKO. In a Wednesday news release, the Edmonson County Sheriff’s Office said Richardson “made admissions to using methamphetamine and marijuana,” and blood tests taken Monday showed both drugs were in her system, WNKY reported. A search of Richardson’s home uncovered what appeared to be “a small amount” of the drugs, according to the news station. Richardson is being held at the Hart County Jail. Deputies also arrested her boyfriend, 56-year-old William Suttle, on charges of possessing drugs and drug paraphernalia, WNKY reported. Read more here or here.
  • A school librarian at Cedar Hills Elementary in Jacksonville is charged with grand theft. Jail records show 61-year-old Pamela Drinkwater is being held on no bond. School District Police arrested Drinkwater on Wednesday, but the specifics of her arrest were not yet available. Drinkwater has been an employee with Duval Schools since 2008, having worked at Enterprise Learning Academy and Long Branch Elementary before being assigned to Cedar Hills in 2014. Cedar Hills Principal Marva McKinney said in a robocall to parents that this type of behavior is not tolerated, and the school is cooperating fully with internal and external investigation.  “Due to internal and external investigations surround this situation, I cannot share any further information, but I can tell you that the staff member will be reassigned from her school duties pending the outcome of the internal investigation by our Office of Professional Standards”, said McKinney. 
  • After another chilly morning, we're in for a nice couple of days. We’ll see lots of sun and not a whole lot of wind with temperatures near 70 degrees.  The average high is 69 degrees. Action News Jax Chief Meteorologist Mike Buresh says Saturday will be cooler because of a wind shift that will also bring a chance for showers.  Sunday may bring a few showers and will be partly to mostly cloudy with afternoon temperatures near 70, but cooler at the beaches.  The new work week will start off unseasonably warm with temps approaching 80 degrees. 

The Latest News Videos