ON AIR NOW

LISTEN NOW

Weather

cloudy-day
88°
Mostly Cloudy
H 85° L 78°
  • cloudy-day
    88°
    Current Conditions
    Mostly Cloudy. H 85° L 78°
  • cloudy-day
    83°
    Evening
    Mostly Cloudy. H 85° L 78°
  • cloudy-day
    79°
    Morning
    Partly Cloudy. H 89° L 77°
LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

The latest top stories

00:00 | 00:00

LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

The latest traffic report

00:00 | 00:00

LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

The latest forecast

00:00 | 00:00

Local
Jaguars ready to move forward with $500 million development of Lot J
Close

Jaguars ready to move forward with $500 million development of Lot J

Jaguars ready to move forward with $500 million development of Lot J
Photo Credit: via Jacksonville Jaguars

Jaguars ready to move forward with $500 million development of Lot J

The Jacksonville Jaguars want to move forward with redeveloping Lot J near TIAA Bank Field, and they believe that effort will total around $500 million.

During the annual “State of the Franchise” event, Jaguars President Mark Lamping contended that the effort is already underway, through the pending removal of the Hart Bridge ramps in Downtown. The City, State, and federal government have committed equal funding shares to demolish those elevated lanes and bring traffic right down to Bay Street.

“This is really the project, the necessary first step, to unlock the full development potential of the Shipyards and Lot J,” Lamping says.

Lamping says they believe work will get underway after this upcoming Jags season, and the City is hoping the project will be done by the end of 2021. Developers see the ramps as a visual barrier between the Complex and the River, and as a road that brings prospective customers up and over the development, as opposed to through it. The hope is that bringing traffic down to Bay Street will support retail, restaurants, and other development in that area.

As for the development of Lot J itself, Lamping outlined the four components- a live arena, 200-room boutique hotel, more than 300-unit residential tower, and office building. He says they have a hotel operator prepared, and Cordish Companies- the partner on this whole project- would manage the live arena. To move forward, what they need now is City approval.

“I’m confident, given the Mayor’s agenda and belief in having Downtown grow and have it be significantly more desirable for people to work, for people to live, and for people to visit, that as long as we focus on their shared goals, I have no doubt that we’ll reach an agreement, and then it’ll be up to the City Council to hopefully ratify that,” Lamping says.


Jacksonville Mayor Lenny Curry is, in turn, signaling support.

“I look forward to the city being involved in solidifying a development agreement with the Jaguars and their plan for Lot J. This is a very important piece of the puzzle for the continued growth and expansion of our sports and entertainment district, downtown Jacksonville and the overall economy,” Curry says in a statement to WOKV.

The push to develop Lot J hit a recent hiccup. JEA had been considering Lot J, Kings Avenue Station on the Southbank, and West Adams Street near the County Courthouse as possible sites for their new corporate headquarters, and they ultimately chose Ryan Companies’ proposal for West Adams Street. JEA and its hundreds of employees would have been an anchor for the Lot J development, also creating a customer base for surrounding development.

GALLERY: JEA headquarters proposal for Lot J

In announcing its decision, JEA’s Board concluded the Ryan Companies had been more responsive and presented a bid that would best suit customers and employees. Board Chair Alan Howard tells WOKV the role of JEA is not to be any kind of economic catalyst.

“What I personally believe is it’s not like Jacksonville Downtown has so much going for it, that we can afford to lose the opportunity to bring a catalyst, something that will deliver other development,” Lamping says.

He says he thinks JEA could have been a part of that vision, but says he nonetheless wishes them the best of luck and hopes for their success. Lamping says, at this time, they do not have a tenant committed to the proposed office space, but they have some entities who have shown interest.

Lot J is just one part of the overall redevelopment of the Sports Complex that Khan is pursuing. For years, he has contended a healthy Downtown- especially in and around the stadium- will mean a financially healthy football team.

via Jacksonville Jaguars
Close

Sports Complex redevelopment

Photo Credit: via Jacksonville Jaguars

That effort has led Khan to twice pursue redevelopment of the Shipyards, along the St. Johns River. While the first effort faltered, he was selected for a second time as the Master Developer of the site, which was expanded to include Met Park. Khan’s team continues negotiations with the City on that proposal, and they have through mid-next year to come forward with a plan.

“This has been a little bit slower and, yeah, you could say a bit frustrating, but you know I think we’re as determined as ever, ready to get it done. Because I believe in it,  I think the Jaguars and the community really need it. It’s like anything else, if you’re not growing, you’re dying. And we need that, and we need to keep the momentum going,” Khan says.

While the overall Shipyards effort has taken a long time, Khan has pulled elements out of the plan. Daily’s Place- the amphitheater and flex field at TIAA Bank Field- are examples of that, as Khan separately partnered with the City to build those, instead of waiting for the broader development. He also separately put forward a proposal for a Convention Center and hotel on the Shipyards property, as a competing bid when the Downtown Investment Authority was looking to put up a Convention Center a few blocks away at the old Courthouse and Annex site. The DIA not only did not take up Khan’s bid, but recently, at the request of Mayor Lenny Curry, decided to put aside the Convention Center plans altogether.

GALLERY: Shad Khan’s proposal for the Jacksonville Shipyards

Khan says a lot of the heavy lifting for the Shipyards has already been done behind the scenes, through coordination with various levels of government. He hopes to have visual proof of progress soon.

As for Lot J specifically, there will be an ask for public dollars, but the exact amount is not yet clear. Khan says they will look at areas like parking, environmental work, and infrastructure. The development plan itself- including some of those financial details- has not yet been put forward.

Lamping says time is of the essence, because they want to ensure Downtown is healthy in to the future. He says the population has been shifting to the Southeast, and they need to balance that out before there is a tipping point that leaves Downtown behind.

Read More

The Latest News Headlines

  • Officials are investigating after an explicit video was shared “inadvertently and unknowingly” from a Mississippi teacher’s phone, authorities said. >> Read more trending news  According to a statement from Horn Lake police, the department received information regarding the video Wednesday.  DeSoto County Schools are conducting an investigation into the video, which reportedly showed explicit content of a teacher in the district. Police said if there was a “criminal element regarding the release of the video,” Horn Lake officers will then initiate a full investigation. School officials have not identified the teacher who was seen in the video, and the contents of the video have not been released at this time. The school district did confirm to WHBQ that the teacher involved is no longer an employee there. Again, officials told WHBQ that the video was shared without the teacher’s knowledge.
  • The Jacksonville Sheriff's Office is asking for the public's help identifying a suspect they say committed a burglary involving a battery in Arlington. According to police, their investigation has revealed that a suspect entered a victim's home overnight while she was asleep. Police say the suspect woke up the victim, threatened and battered her, and then took some of her belongings.  If you have information on who this individual is, you're urged to contact the sheriff's office at (904) 630-0500 or Crime Stoppers at 1-866-845-TIPS.
  • In a series of tweets Friday, President Donald Trump announced new retaliatory tariffs against China, bumping up taxes by 5 percentage points.  >> MORE: China, Trump ratchet up tensions with new tariffs >> Read more trending news  Here’s a look at trade tariffs and what they do. What is a tariff? A tariff is a tax on imports or exports that increases their prices. Tariffs are used by governments to make foreign products less attractive to consumers in order to protect domestic industries from competition. Money collected under a tariff is called a duty or customs duty. What types of tariffs are there?There are two types of tariffs – an ad valorem tariff and a specific tariff. An ad valorem tariff is a tariff that is a fixed percentage of the value of an imported good. If the price of the imported good goes up, the ad valorem tariff goes up. If it goes down, the tariff goes down. For instance, if a company exports an item to the United States costing $50 and the ad valorem tariff on that product is 20 percent, the company would have to pay the tariff -- $10 in this case -- to export the product to the U.S. If the price of the item goes up to $75, the company will have to pay a tariff of $15 to sell the item in the US. A specific tariff is a fixed amount of money placed on the item no matter the cost. Say there is a $20 specific tariff on that $50 item. The company exporting the item to the US would have to pay $20 to sell the item in the U.S. If the item goes up in cost to $75, the company will still have to pay $20 to export the item. Why should I care if the US government puts a tariff on items? The manufacturer pays for that, right? Sure, manufacturers pay the tariff upfront, but the cost of the tariff will be passed along to the consumer. Or, if the cost of the tariff is too high for those exporting goods, then they stop exporting goods. Tariffs affect the cost of goods you buy, and the U.S. buys many more products than it sells. So, why slap tariffs on goods if it will hurt the US consumer? The theory is that as goods made by people outside the U.S. get more expensive, manufacturers within the country will either increase their production of the product or other companies will begin to produce the product, thus strengthening the U.S. economy.
  • The Baker County Sheriff's Office is announcing an arrest, following an incident Thursday were a young child was found unresponsive in a hot car. According to the sheriff's office, the 3-year-old boy's mother is now being charged with child neglect. Deputies say 23-year-old Katie Davis failed to provide the toddler with proper care and supervision.  Investigators say the boy's father had been at work all night and went to bed at approximately 7:00 AM, Thursday morning. They say that Davis also went back to sleep around that same time with the child, despite having slept some the night before.  Investigators say when Davis woke up around 1:30 PM, she realized the boy was no longer in the bed. We're told that she then discovered him inside the couple's car outside, where some of his toys had been kept.  Deputies say Davis and her husband were able to get him out by smashing one of the windows and unlocking the doors.  The boy was airlifted to Wolfson Children's Hospital in Jacksonville, Thursday afternoon. Deputies said Friday he's recovering and stable.
  • According to many polls, Americans – especially those who say they are Democrats -- are not that fond of the Electoral College. Neither are many of the Democratic candidates for president. >> Read more trending news  With just over 14 months until the 2020 presidential election, a movement to change the way electoral votes are awarded and who will be elected president has gained some steam. The National Popular Vote Compact (NPV), which has its roots in the most contested presidential election in U.S. history, sets in state law a policy that awards all a state’s electoral votes to the candidate who wins the national popular vote. Under the Electoral College system used today, 48 states have a “winner-take-all” system that awards all the state’s electoral votes to the person who gets a majority of votes in that state. The Electoral College does not take into consideration that national popular vote. Sixteen states, along with the District of Columbia, have passed the NPV agreement. They are California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maryland, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon and Rhode Island. While legislation has been passed in the 16 states and the District of Columbia, the agreement would not go into effect until states with a collective 270 electoral votes — the number needed to win the presidency — agree to join. Currently, the District of Columbia and the 16 states in the agreement hold a combined total of 196 electoral votes, meaning the pact would need enough new state members to get 74 electoral votes.Supporters say the system would give the person who got the most votes country-wide the presidency he or she deserves. Opponents say states would be forced to hand over electoral votes to a candidate who did not win that state. For instance, in the 2016 election, a state such as Florida, in which President Donald Trump earned more votes, would have had to pledge its 29 electoral votes to Trump’s opponent, Hillary Clinton, who won the national popular vote in the 2016 election. The Electoral College of today was established by the Twelfth Amendment to the Constitution which replaced the method for electing the president and vice president provided in Article II, Section 1, Clause 3. Under the system, when voters cast a ballot for president, they are actually choosing members of the Electoral College, called electors, who are pledged to that presidential candidate. Following the election for president, electors then meet to choose the president. Electors almost always vote for their state’s popular vote winner, and some states have laws requiring them to do so. However, electors are not bound by federal law to vote for a specific candidate – for instance, the one who won the popular vote in their state. In 29 states and the District of Columbia, electors are bound by state law or by a pledge they sign to vote for the candidate who won the popular vote of the state they represent. Five men have won the presidency in the Electoral College while not winning the country’s popular vote: John Quincy Adams in 1824, Rutherford B. Hayes in 1876, Benjamin Harrison in 1888, George W. Bush in 2000 and Donald Trump in 2016. The National Popular Vote campaign goes back to Democratic presidential candidate Al Gore's loss to Bush in 2000, according to The Associated Press. Gore won the popular vote but lost the election over a vote count in Florida.

The Latest News Videos